Hosted by Cstar1|Galaxies & More!
We keep our star talk down to earth! Beginning stargazers, professional astronomers, armchair astronauts and the cosmologically curious are all invited to join us. Galaxies Astronomy Club was founded in 1994.
1573 messages in 259 discussions
Latest 4/27/19 by Cstar1
3571 messages in 838 discussions
177 messages in 23 discussions
9990 messages in 6758 discussions
2445 messages in 1638 discussions
183 messages in 110 discussions
684 messages in 442 discussions
1328 messages in 338 discussions
1471 messages in 1135 discussions
847 messages in 486 discussions
373 messages in 246 discussions
4108 messages in 2606 discussions
455 messages in 115 discussions
3006 messages in 2166 discussions
656 messages in 148 discussions
428 messages in 402 discussions
True, but left on its own, or with any wind, and the sides collapse and soften.
I've been expecting-and seeing-amazing images of Pluto from the close approach flyby of the New Horizons probe from mid-July. And even though I knew the images taken once the spacecraft was past Pluto would be lovely, I still wasn't quite prepared for just how awe-inspiring they would be. Behold:Read more from Slate Magazine
"True, but left on its own, or with any wind, and the sides collapse and soften."
Much less gravity and I doubt Charon has any wind to speak of.
Can you say "bullshit" at NASA? The principal investigator for NASA's New Horizons mission did, in an outburst directed at the tortuous rules that led to Pluto's reclassification as a dwarf planet. "It's bullshit," Alan Stern, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute, told Tech Insider - with the clear intent of being quoted.Read more from GeekWire
How's that for a milestone: Pluto is now in Google Earth (er...Google Pluto?). http://t.co/QvgK6axdZy HT @skdh pic.twitter.com/qgxAC93RvW— Corey S. Powell (@coreyspowell) July 31, 2015
Too cool! #PlutoFlyby pic.twitter.com/gkIu0cge0v— NewHorizons2015 (@NewHorizons2015) August 8, 2015
Scientists are about to decide where to send NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft next. http://t.co/lcqvHBtNq8 pic.twitter.com/hKtgYFQEFN— Spaceflight Now (@SpaceflightNow) August 12, 2015
A simulation of the Pluto flyby.
Pluto, we have a problem: Some geographical names may not fly on @IAU_org's maps: http://t.co/RVKsAAwZM3 pic.twitter.com/O720R2Vgz1— Alan Boyle (@b0yle) August 26, 2015
Spock, Kirk and Vader Crater also could be controversial, even though those science-fiction icons fit nicely within the IAU’s categories for features on Charon. During a series of interviews over the past month, Schulz voiced concern that some names may not be enduring enough to merit recognition. “We must be sure that a few generations after us, no one asks, ‘How could they name it for somebody no one knows?'” the Berliner Morgenpost quoted her as saying last week.
The IAU also wants to make sure the names on Pluto and its moons reflect a wide variety of the planet’s cultures, and not just Hollywood icons.
Does it matter what the IAU thinks? New Horizons’ principal investigator, Alan Stern, doesn’t think so. He has lambasted the organization for the way it treated Pluto, and got under the IAU’s skin by setting up informal naming systems for extrasolar planets and Martian craters. By some accounts, those dust-ups have added to the friction over New Horizons’ nicknames.
Uh, sorry, but you ask the average 20, 30, 40 or 50 year old who Styx, Charon, Nix & Kerberos were. I'll bet they can't tell you. But they can tell you who Spock, Kirk & Vader were.