Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

With the investigation into alleged war crimes committed by Australian Special Forces in Afghanistan coming to an end, a judge involved warns the findings will cause "distress" for some soldiers involved.

That's an article full of weasel words and euphemisms, but manages to get across a balanced and fair summation of what's described.

The feelings of the criminals are far more important than those of the victims.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

SAS patrol members who witnessed the newly uncovered killing say an intellectually disabled man was shot by their colleague in the back of the head as he was trying to "limp" away.

If he were ever to come to trial there'd be a wave of love for the perpetrator and a wave of hate for the victim.

From you, probably.

You have cheered on the monsters in the past.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

You have cheered on the monsters in the past.

Which monsters have I cheered on?

I've stated the obvious, Hamas and Hezbollah have never attacked me or the British or any nation other than Israel - and that only in very feeble retaliation.

Meanwhile, monsters are cheered on all the time in here - including their success in avoiding justice.

Even when the complicity of my police has let them go - the story simply gets disappeared! This story was at the Indendent, it has almost completely vanished from the web as well.

Why Israeli general avoided Heathrow arrest

19 February 2008

... Major-General Doron Almog avoided arrest in September 2005 after he was tipped off that officers planned to detain him on landing at Heathrow airport.

He refused to leave his El Al flight, and remained on board for two hours before returning to Israel.

Leaked documents show police did not board the plane to detain him at the airport because they were worried about the dangers of an armed confrontation.

... Law firm Hickman and Rose, who represent Maj Gen Almog's alleged victims, said: "Victims of war crimes allegedly committed by Doron Almog have been very badly let down by the Metropolitan Police Service's failure to keep Mr Almog from finding out about the arrest warrant before it was executed, and to arrest Mr Almog when they had the opportunity to board the plane at Heathrow airport.

"These are serious failures which raise concerns about the effectiveness of the police in cases where international criminal suspects come into the country."

A police decisions log used by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) showed police feared a clash with armed El Al air marshals or Maj Gen Almog's security guards.

: "Another consideration (was) that El Al flights carried armed air marshals, which raised issues around public safety.

"There was also no intelligence as to whether Mr Almog would have been travelling with personal security as befitted his status, armed or otherwise."

Maj Gen Almog planned to visit the UK to make social and charitable visits to Jewish communities in Manchester and Solihull.

Lawyers acting for the Palestinian campaigners, who say their homes were destroyed illegally in retaliation for an Israeli attack, lobbied the Metropolitan Police to get involved.

The Met initially refused to act due to pressures on counter-terrorism teams after the London bombings, but a judge eventually issued an arrest warrant for a private prosecution.

Det Supt MacBrayne wrote: "The plan was to intercept Mr Almog at the immigration desk where he would then be escorted to Heathrow police station. Once at the police station, he could receive legal advice whilst a decision was made to execute the warrant."

But news of the planned arrest was leaked to the Israeli Embassy and he was warned of the plan.

The law firm today criticised police for failing to maintain a high enough level of secrecy over the arrest warrant.

But the IPCC investigation, which concluded last summer, found no proof that officers had leaked information. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/why-israeli-general-avoided-heathrow-arrest-784147.html

BerrySteph said:

Which monsters have I cheered on?

KJU, Putin, Assad, Pol Pot, Hitler, Osama Bin Laden, Gaddafi...

And the men who shot the women and newborn babies in Afghanistan.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

KJU, Putin, Assad, Pol Pot, Hitler, Osama Bin Laden, Gaddafi... And the men who shot the women and newborn babies in Afghanistan.

I've condemned all of those who have launched unprovoked attacks on other sovereign nations (and Pol Pot, who didn't do that - but was a genocidal puppet of the US).

What I've cheered on is resistance to destruction and genocide by the US - or their puppet rogue nation.

I've gone a bit further in relation to Hamas and Hezbollah and pointed out that they've never attacked me or the British or any nation other than Israel - and that only in very feeble retaliation.

Meanwhile, your buddies won't even tell me the borders of the state they insist I must recognise.

Let alone defend the kiddy-torturing it practises.

The hunt for Truth and Justice is noble when you ally this to Political manipulation then you will not have Truth or Justice but a witch hunt .

How will the ICC deal with (as examples) The Taliban or Hamas or Hezbollah or ISIL the myriads of groups who have committed incredible acts of violence of course they cant and they wont .

Where is the courts decision to act against Assad or the Russians - there is none there never will be

BM