Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 776
    MEMBERS
  • 37943
    MESSAGES
  • 47
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Harry and Meghan - who gives a crap?   The U.K and Europe

Started Jan-13 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 3193 views.
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Jan-13

Sigh... apparently this is news and it won't stop invading my news site.


Harold27Z

From: Harold27Z

Jan-13

The bible refers to DNA traitors:

Esra 9:2  For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers have been chief in this trespass.

PTG (anotherPTG)

From: PTG (anotherPTG)

Jan-13

IMHO You are completely do-lally!

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

Jan-13

I note that you are still into misquotes, in this case adding the Word "really". Actually the general public has no "real" need to know anything about this. We have a similar situation with our monarchy where the right wing press puts their activities in the news section, and the left wing puts it in te society section, which neither I nor most of my Friends read. I read your attached clip, which is what belongs in the society section as opposed to the news section of any reputable periodical. Without reading anything, considering my views of the concept of mmnarchy as a symptom of an immature state, is that if not within my life time, monarchy of any real value Will simply disappear and be reduced to a mutual admirtion society of only royals caring about what royals do - there are many "royal" familes detached from their imaginary kingdoms (Romanofs, royal families of the kingdom of the two Sicilies, Savoy, Romania, Hapsbergs, Greeks, Braganzas. France etc.) The only difference between them and Spain, UK, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Luxemberg, Leihtenstein, Monaco, etc. is that they have some sort of expensive relationship with their former kingdoms.)Basicly when it comes to progress, they are simply rich play Boys, getting in the way, and used as a distraction for the ignorant masses who support their institutions. In the case of the "DUKES" of Sussix what I see is a "royal" who realices that monarchy is a dead end carrer, so he is bailing out, so he and his family can have a normal and usuful life, untainted by the family and the media. The duke´s comments regarding royal responsibilities, are basicly meaningless, a way of getting away from dad and gran, whose feelings and sence of security are hurt. For me it would be best, now that the statement has been made, iss to just stop talking to the press and forgetting all about "royal" issues. As a "duke" of a non existent duchy, the title is virtually meaningless. his position in the line of succession means he Will always be a useless grandson, son, uncle to what ever comes - in film terms sort of a costumed walk on roll, a cardboard figure taking up space. Now the Dukes of Sussex as a couple Will have a chance to make something of themselves or not, either way of no importance or significanse in world terms. Of course ignorant royalists Will blame Megan, because she is divorced, American, Black, etc. but she Will probably find this easier to handle then any role as duchess consort, royal coutier. There are a lot of princes in the world, so I doubt of the duke Will identify with this title which has no real substance. 

There is a Spanish surname and title called "hidalgo", roughly meanin that the person is a nobody, but the son of somebody. There is no necessary responsibility, land, income, responsibiility tied to that of prince because every child of every monarch and duke or prince in the world is automaticly a prince, based on their parent. Making them dukes as in this case on marriage, is simply a way of saying that the Little prince has become an adult. Both new dukes in the U.K. and the two infants of Spain, became duchesses on their marriages (Lugo and Palma), equally meaningless, except on the society page.

Harold27Z

From: Harold27Z

Jan-13

I did not make that up all by myself.  When insulting the word of God YHWH, it helps to be a PC heathen, atheist, pagan and/or satanist.

 I could provide other examples of offensive offending integrationist leaders but the names would have no significance to you.

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

Jan-13

RGoss99 said:

In the case of the "DUKES" of Sussix what I see is a "royal" who realices that monarchy is a dead end carrer, so he is bailing out, so he and his family can have a normal and usuful life, untainted by the family and the media. The duke´s comments regarding royal responsibilities, are basicly meaningless, a way of getting away from dad and gran, whose feelings and sence of security are hurt. For me it would be best, now that the statement has been made, iss to just stop talking to the press and forgetting all about "royal" issues. As a "duke" of a non existent duchy, the title is virtually meaningless. his position in the line of succession means he Will always be a useless grandson, son, uncle to what ever comes - in film terms sort of a costumed walk on roll, a cardboard figure taking up space. Now the Dukes of Sussex as a couple Will have a chance to make something of themselves or not, either way of no importance or significanse in world terms.

I sincerely hope that Harry and Meghan will export Royalty to the benighted people falling under the spell of an "elected monarch" who thinks he's above the law.

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

Jan-13

I am not sure where you are comming from. Export what from where considering that culturally Hrry and Meghan come from different sides of the fence.

As a foreigner and a person of color I can´t see Meghan having much effect on the U.K. establishmnt. and the same with Harry on North America for the opposite reasons.

If they have an agenda it has nothing to do with change in either case, they probably just want to be left alone to do their own thing which is virtually impossible with Harry

caught between his wife and generation compared to his family and tradition.

In reply toRe: msg 7
bml00

From: bml00

Jan-14

The Sussex's are not bailing out , they are having a break , they will be supported by Private Family money , they will retain their titles and honors and will live the most comfortable of lives slightly out of the spot light

For all the nonsense being written it is self apparent they want nothing more than a break , he wants to be HRH she the same , they both want to have grace and favor homes and all the Range Rovers they can obtain .

Prince Charles is paying some £2.5 million annually to him and this will increase if he decides to take less from the Government Stipend

The Royals have taken a real bashing and will need time to reorganise themselves with their PR , no doubt Prince Philip will oblige and drop dead and the out pouring will be enormous with much pomp and pageant which will help paper over the current tough times The  House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (their original title) are currently experiencing .

BM

  • Edited January 14, 2020 1:39 am  by  bml00
BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

Jan-14

RGoss99 said:

As a foreigner and a person of color I can´t see Meghan having much effect on the U.K. establishmnt. and the same with Harry on North America for the opposite reasons.

Royalty solidifies alliances by marriage between ruling houses. 

Harry and Meghan would need to start travelling and meeting everyone in the US until they knew more people than anyone else there.

They'd have to smoosh politicians until the point where leaders came to them for a blessing.

Then the US would have a Royal Family that could stop them going off the rails.

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

Jan-14

wHILE THEY ARE COSYING UP TO HOLLYWOOD, THEIR CURRENT PLANS ARETO LIVE IN CANADA.

TOP