And more threats.

Lovely.

You don't want to go there or try that with me, Jen . . . others have tried it in the past and each and every time they fell on their face . . .

And more threats.

Lovely.

That is not a threat . . . you made a false accusation toward me in the open forum . . . I don't take that from anyone . . . I don't give  a damn who you are or think you are . . . if my hand is forced, I don't hold back . . . 

Now if you think I have supposedly done you wrong in a PM, then address it in PM . . . don't try and play this empty crap in open forum where no one has the opportunity to see if the empty claim of yours holds any validity or not . . .

No, he didn't call me a Nazi today! The troll called me something far worse.....a child abuser!

In your absence, due to the time difference, maybe appointing a moderator would help?

SquaddyB said:

In your absence, due to the time difference, maybe appointing a moderator would help?

I've asked.

I can't get any help.

8645 (RedBV) said:

you made a false accusation toward me in the open forum . . . I don't take that from anyone . . .

I did?  What was false?

Let's get this thread back on track.

Of course, "you all don't deserve to live in this country with the rest of us".  Just a really enlightened, inclusive statement.  What a turd.

What really saddens me is that you support this shit.  The absolute disregard of any opinion other than your own is very sad.

I think I'll follow my original inclination - to not take part in any of these "discussions".  They aren't discussions, or debates.  They are simply attacks on differing opinions.

Real simple - you claimed I supposedly threatened you . . . not ta mention the bald faced accusation, that was a lie, you made to me in PM last night . . . 

katiek2 said:

They are simply attacks on differing opinions.

Anti-vaxxers and climate change deniers are holding humanity back.

People are LITERALLY dying so these asshats can have their "differing opinion."

How many deaths is an acceptable number so you can keep the debate going?

Reducing children's deaths to a percentage is a messed up thing to do.

So 400 kids died out of 600,000 total deaths.  That's a paltry amount, right.

Meanwhile, 400 kids are dead from a completely preventable disease.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

So 400 kids died out of 600,000 total deaths.  That's a paltry amount, right. Meanwhile, 400 kids are dead from a completely preventable disease.

How are you so sure you know the actual scientific data when even scientists can't agree on what the data is?  Remember thalidomide?  We don't want a repeat of that, do we?  I personally refuse to keep the debate going simply because there's no point to it.  I'm not going to change my opinion, nor am I going to try to force my opinion on someone else.  I personally don't think vaccinations for children should even be a point of discussion.  In the US, every school-age child must be vaxed against mumps, measles, rubella, polio,  & chickenpox.  So what's the big deal about one more?  At least that is what was required when I went to school and when my kids went.  I'm sure some children had reactions to those shots, but there were no politicians stumping for votes at the time. 

BTW, you're not going to change anyone's mind by calling them asshats, climate change deniers and killers.  They just tune you out and you've accomplished nothing.