Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 1204
    MEMBERS
  • 62541
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Is North Korea a nuclear threat?   Asia

Started 6/13/18 by OSarge (DD214_98); 57312 views.
BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph 

7/6/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Actually Kim sends his people to Africa as slave labour. The slaves are sequestered in one building and Kim keeps all the money they are paid for himself.  I mean, they get one meal a day and Kim's gratitude.  What more could they want?

How is Korea to be re-united without bloodshed if KJU is not provided with a pension?

Or is the real aim to do the opposite, the more millions of Koreans (North and South) the better?

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph) 

7/6/19

bml00 said:

The first to arrive will be the textile conglomerates looking for low paid staff but these huge companies have end buyers in the West who they depend on who insist keeping to the Fair Trade agreement of staffing requirements.  The tidal wave when it starts is unstoppable

As tidal waves go, this one might improve the landscape.

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph) 

7/6/19

BerrySteph said:

How is Korea to be re-united without bloodshed if KJU is not provided with a pension?

I agree that KJU will want to retain power - but we know what he does with it, so that power can only be symbolic.

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph 

7/6/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

I agree that KJU will want to retain power - but we know what he does with it, so that power can only be symbolic.

Korea can be re-unified with or without bloodshed - which do you prefer?

And it can happen sooner or later - which do you prefer?

bml00

From: bml00 

7/6/19

Money being the root of all evil but in this case it will be investment in NK that will ultimately one release NK from its slavery .

The Giant NK army is jut another way of keeping them off the street and complaining ,in any standoff with the US they would be powerless

BM 

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph) 

7/7/19

BerrySteph said:

Korea can be re-unified with or without bloodshed - which do you prefer?

That's a stupid question, and I'm insulted that you think I would prefer the former.

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph) 

7/7/19

bml00 said:

Money being the root of all evil but in this case it will be investment in NK that will ultimately one release NK from its slavery .

Agree.

And wouldn't it be great to have a Trump Tower in Pyongyang!

Well, great for Trump at least.

bml00

From: bml00 

7/7/19

Unlike some, I have no axe to grind with Trump , he is trying and it is better to have tried and failed than never try at all.

If getting a Trump Tower gets us a step closer to finding some arrangement with JKU who cares , small potatoes .

bm

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph) 

7/7/19

Agree.

There would also be heavy scrutiny over the working conditions of the builders.

In reply toRe: msg 142
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph) 

7/7/19

TOP