What Jennifer fails to get is that her posts getting my "G" rating are "a complete waste of time and energy" for her, unless she is able to justify the posts she chooses to send me that are rated as such. They are not even a Little "waste of time and energy " for me because my secretary usually deletes them before I have a chance to even notice them.

Any time a person gets a "G" they are welcome to challenge it, but  Jennifer never does, she simply plays "poor me" and pretends she is the victim instead of the oppressor when she invades my personal space. If she can not defend her posts to me, the best solution is not to post to me.

You can talk to me, Goss.

Snide remarks to others about me should be beneath a man of your standing.

I remain unimpressed.

Jennifer really does not understand. First it is not an algorhythm it is simply a function. Secondly, she is the one typing it, for me it is simply a maco, click message deleted, respons sent. Of course she has a choice she could stop posting such to me in the first place.

RGoss99 said:

Any time a person gets a "G" they are welcome to challenge it, but  Jennifer never does, she simply plays "poor me" and pretends she is the victim instead of the oppressor when she invades my personal space. If she can not defend her posts to me, the best solution is not to post to me.

I agree.

I find your posts interesting and your irritation at some of the responses you get very understandable.

RGoss99 said:

for me it is simply a maco, click message deleted, respons sent.

This is the thing I don't understand.

Please, explain.

WHY does a G=G+1response even HAVE to be sent?

Why not just delete the message and ignore the post?

Sending the G=G+1 macro just pisses people off.

And YOU KNOW IT!

So it is not "taking the high road", or "saving yourself (or your secretary) time".  It is a deliberate provocation that says "I need you to know how little I regard the time you spent on that post, but simply not replying is not enough.  Simply ignoring it is not enough.  I MUST send you this little macro that ensures you are properly insulted.  For without it, you would not know that you are being ignored by me.  And you HAVE to know."

How close am I to the truth there?

Please understand that a reply of G=G+1 means I am right, and you accept this spot-on observation of your thought process.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Sending the G=G+1 macro just pisses people off.

Doesn't piss me off.

But then, I'm using this system "properly" to research all sorts of things I find interesting (including the crimes of the Zionists).

Works very well. RGoss doesn't help me much but he does document living at peace with your neighbours.