I remain unimpressed.

Jennifer really does not understand. First it is not an algorhythm it is simply a function. Secondly, she is the one typing it, for me it is simply a maco, click message deleted, respons sent. Of course she has a choice she could stop posting such to me in the first place.

RGoss99 said:

Any time a person gets a "G" they are welcome to challenge it, but  Jennifer never does, she simply plays "poor me" and pretends she is the victim instead of the oppressor when she invades my personal space. If she can not defend her posts to me, the best solution is not to post to me.

I agree.

I find your posts interesting and your irritation at some of the responses you get very understandable.

RGoss99 said:

for me it is simply a maco, click message deleted, respons sent.

This is the thing I don't understand.

Please, explain.

WHY does a G=G+1response even HAVE to be sent?

Why not just delete the message and ignore the post?

Sending the G=G+1 macro just pisses people off.

And YOU KNOW IT!

So it is not "taking the high road", or "saving yourself (or your secretary) time".  It is a deliberate provocation that says "I need you to know how little I regard the time you spent on that post, but simply not replying is not enough.  Simply ignoring it is not enough.  I MUST send you this little macro that ensures you are properly insulted.  For without it, you would not know that you are being ignored by me.  And you HAVE to know."

How close am I to the truth there?

Please understand that a reply of G=G+1 means I am right, and you accept this spot-on observation of your thought process.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Sending the G=G+1 macro just pisses people off.

Doesn't piss me off.

But then, I'm using this system "properly" to research all sorts of things I find interesting (including the crimes of the Zionists).

Works very well. RGoss doesn't help me much but he does document living at peace with your neighbours.

G=G+1 for already explaied. However for those with blinders and/or short attention span. If someone goes to the trouble of posting to me (or pretends to for the benefit of others) it is considered polite to respond, and not just ignore it as you seem to do by focusing on some trivia while avoiding the message (example by definition your use of "euphenism" to make a negativ more negative is a misues of the word - by point which you still hav not responded to, inspite of all the posts you have sent to me that miss the point which is if <EU>phenism is 180º wrong, then the logical opposit would be <<CACA>>phnism, two recognized Greek prefixes meaning good and bad. So insead of wasting my time repeating previous responses to such posts, I save myself the necessity of repeating myself the "G" post which is only a negative if you don´t challenge it by justifying your post to which it is a response -- try it some time you might learn something. When it comes to associating "insult" to my macro, you are ignoring the fact that I said it is not, but just a message giving you an opportunity, instead of playing the poor me, I choose to be insulted game. No, I don´t have to have known because my secrety knows what I have posted, therefor knows that your response does not connect. She hits the macro to save me time. Yes, if you responded to the macro it would mean you consider yourself right, but without justifying your opinion, with evidence or facts, you have faile to negate the "G=G+1" by getting a "G=G-1" which lowers your G score.

You have stated that G=G+1 is an automated response.

That is SPAM.

I have said in the rules that SPAM will be deleted on sight.

I have amended those rules to include your annoying macro.

SPAM will be deleted on sight.  This includes "automated responses". Your macro system may be ingenious to you, but it's SPAM to everyone else.

You are not qualifiaed to speak for your imaginary everybody else. In addition, as per usual, your language skills are lacking because my definition of "spam" supported by a dictionary is very different then yours. Example:  unsolicited usually commercial messages (such as e-mails, text messages, or Internet postings) sent to a large number of recipients or posted in a large number of places (Webster). So lets analyze my "G=G+1" it is solicited because it is a responce to a post from you, it is not comercial. It is sent to you not to a large number of people. Just because it is an automatic response, does not make it spam because it is motivated by your post. If you enter "cheap (airline) tickets" you get an automatic response based on your entry e.g. this is not spam. Even if later "cheap tickets" advertises some special deal, it is not spam because it is motivated by your initial entry.

G=G+1, with a potential more "G"´s to come because I doubt if you can respond to my request for your definition supported by anything but your weak language skills and imagination.

OK lets here your definition to see how your opinión matches up with reality. 

Goss is a teacher  - with his spelling I would not send my dead hamster to be taught by him , what does he teach other than to talk bollocks for which I am sure he can show several diplomas

BM