Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
4897 messages in 209 discussions
Latest 6/19/20 by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
827 messages in 16 discussions
Latest Feb-16 by kitchenlawn
17321 messages in 772 discussions
Latest Feb-5 by pitirre62
"Long winded" is necessary because unlike those who simply express unsupported opinión, my long winded is my logical support for my position. If you object, especially if not addressed to you, you are quite free not to read such.
Precisely. I occasionally lash out at other correspondents - but only because they've proven themselves deluded or stupid.
In your case, note you are responding to an issue not addressed to you
LOL, you take me back to my childhood, when I would be sent to my room for speaking before I was spoken to!
simply read by you in areas where you are unaware of the previous context
I do read all of the posts in this forum. Unless there is additional discussion going on in PM's or other forums, I am, indeed, aware of previous context.
You also falsely indicate that I say "everyone" else is wrong.
At no point did I indicate you said "everyone else is wrong". I said "I find your long-winded explanations of why you are right and everyone else is wrong ... In other words, it is my opinion that you feel everyone else is wrong.
If you object, especially if not addressed to you, you are quite free not to read such.
I have no objection to anything you say. However, since it seems you find it objectionable that I should deign to respond to a post not specifically addressed to me, I shall honor your disapproval and endeavor to ignore yours.
Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:
Depends on the poll results. Cast your vote.
I'm not going to lower myself to playing any part in this ridiculous charade.
Not at all the same thing, you are claiming an injury on behalf of another person. So while you have a right to your opinión, and a right to express it, The ítem does not apply to you, so it is not the same as a parental power trip shutting up a kid. What makes your point invalid, is you can not even identify the context in which this person was given the first "G" so how can you judge whether it was deserved or not.
Great, you say you read all the posts. If this is the case please identify the first post given to this person, then go back to their penultimate one before that and explain why the "G" was not a proper response. In other words if "aware of the previous context" why not share it with us to justify your point.
If you said "in [your] opinión" I would not have made the comment I did, but since you did not indicate that this was an opinión, your statement reads as an unproveable fact on your part.
I made no objection to your response to a post not addressed to you, I object to your opinión expressed without a logical reason justifying your opinión, because I have no evidence that you know the facts behind it. In other words my question above?
[Please do not bother answering this unless you can include a valid answer to the questions I asked, because otherwise you will just be trolling]
I'm assuming this person is a he?
So can I recommend emasculation instead?
You seem very confused - not difficult, I know!
Kaitlyn MCH, RGoss's cousin, was the moron who claimed to be from Canada one week and Sco'land the next. Surely you remember the goose in his Thruso21 persona?
Stephanie engaging Richard with "intelligent" debate.
I hereby Christian you; The Flowerpot Men.
It's spelt "Culture"