I used this argument when teaching. Students often used the passive-aggressive approach by presenting a snow job, sort of here are a bunch of points so give me a Good grade if you find one you agree with. Z says she uses critical thinking, but her snow job is simply the opposite.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

your deduction: "If argument No. 6 of 8 is disproven, then therefore all other 7 points are disproven" is not only illogical, but a common parlour trick used to deflect attention away from the point you cannot refute and avoid the crux of the argument.

RGoss is entirely right.

Your:

Another opinion.

A long-winded opinion that goes nowhere.

An English lesson.

Someone else debating the exact same thing...

A VERY short debate on the topic.

I wonder if you will look at any of the links.

Is a terrible way to pretend to be defending your position.

And of course, overlaps with time-wasting troll tactics.

G=G+1

Nonsensical rambling.

BerrySteph said:

And of course, overlaps with time-wasting troll tactics.

Says the person who tries to turn every thread into an attack on Jews.

G=G+2

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Says the person who tries to turn every thread into an attack on Jews.

That's a filthy smear.

But only what to expect from a blackmailed sort-of journalist.

G=G+3

BerrySteph said:

That's a filthy smear. But only what to expect from a blackmailed sort-of journalist.

What the frilly fuck are you ON?!

You're clearly blackmailed into ignoring those things we've already done towards Holocaust II.

G=G+1