Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 1150
    MEMBERS
  • 61692
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

LGBTQI... Rights   General Confusion

Started 6/22/19 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 35126 views.
BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

8/30/19

BerrySteph said: The solution is simply - put the choice of judges in the hands of non-politicised professionals.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said: I don't know if there is any such thing. You would have to find clueless idiots with no opinion on any issue - social, political or economical - and then ask them to set up the Supreme Court.

I imagine Oz does things much like us and has none of the terrifying Kavanaugh confirmation.

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/31/19

The Attorney general and Governor general do most of it.

I could not name a single sitting member of our high court.

In reply toRe: msg 38
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/31/19

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

8/31/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:  I could not name a single sitting member of our high court.

That's a bit extreme - but the knowledge that none of them have ever been politicians (nor even members of a political party?) should be hugely comforting to you.

Look again at that Graham Lindsey rant that shuts down the Kavanaugh confirmation.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said: The Attorney general and Governor general do most of it.

Are you sure of that? Political appointees? Not done entirely by officers in the judiciary?

Di (amina046)

From: Di (amina046)

8/31/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

9/1/19

The PM can make recommendations, and likely does it through the attorney general.

As for stacking the court with "like minded" judges, I honestly would not know any of their political leanings any more than I know their name.

I know more names of the SCOTUS than I do my own high court!

Probably because the US system is such a spectacle.

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

9/1/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

I know more names of the SCOTUS than I do my own high court!

Not being propagandised by Occupied Fleet Street?

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

9/2/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

That's a thing?

Occupied Fleet Street is a huge thing - look how they've abandoned Assange.

Even though they once hailed his full membership of the journalistic profession and lapped up his information. (His 100% reliability made it particularly welcome).

However, its Occupied Westminster that bothers me most - look how the Zionists humiliated William Hague, once the wealthiest politician at the top of any party, once leader of the Conservatives and no longer in politics.

bml00

From: bml00

9/4/19

Hague was never the Wealthiest a nice example of a throw away lies , Hague was elevated to a Lord , he resigned due to the loss of an Election , he was out of Government at that point .

Please see William Hague Worth anywhere between 100K to 1 million sterling - that is not the richest ,never was the richest at any time, the lies of the fool are staggering https://celebstrendnow.com/william-hague-net-worth-2/

BM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Hague

  • Edited September 4, 2019 2:23 am  by  bml00
TOP