Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 1220
    MEMBERS
  • 62658
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

UK News - General   The U.K and Europe

Started 7/16/19 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 129786 views.
RGoss99

From: RGoss99

8/19/19

Using the term "passive-aggressive" is not an ad hom, because I am referring to specific behavior that changes the topic of the thread, a request, or a way of avoiding the message of my post. This is not personal because it refers not to the person but to specific behavior that that person chooses to use. To be an ad hom there must be a logical disconnect between the term as used and the person using it. 

To be passive-aggressive one must be unjustifiable offensive. If one objects to what I call passive-aggressive with a "G" this is nota negative, just an opportunity for that person to justify what I consider a post that is a waste of time and cyber space.

While on the subject, I´ll go back and find your missig example as to why you feel this was unjustified.

In reply toRe: msg 62
RGoss99

From: RGoss99

8/19/19

... without a reference I didn´t find the example to which you referred. BTW in terms of physiology, there is always the chance that what you might call "jovial teasing" is just a passive-aggressive way of showing hostility and other improper behavior. the majority of humor unless the speaker is the victim, carries with it a victim and a message, that is not usually positive

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/20/19

You conveniently omitted the part where you justified calling her a coward.

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/20/19

Now I'm passive aggressive, too?

I actually get accused of that a lot.

It seems that people would prefer I outright insult them instead of being diplomatic in my replies.

OK Goss. 

I will be blunt.

Stop insulting people on my forum.  It's a rule.

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

8/20/19

Grammar problema, I did not call her a coward, that charge would require an indicitave sentence, I used a subjunctive, as indicated by the Word "if" and the question "Why be a coward". This describes her not as a  coward, but her action as interpretedly as "cowardly", e.g. not an ad hom. Note you have not provided a sample of my post where I said she was a coward.

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

8/20/19

In this context, yes, your being diplomatic is passive aggressive because the language used while giving an implication leaves you free of the responsibility of your intent. 

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

8/20/19

RGoss99 said:

So what response is posible to an ad hom sent to me would your rules allow.

A bit of mockery. Mention Yosemite Sam.

Msg 928.69 deleted
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/22/19

RGoss99 said:

If you object to the criteria I use, why be a passive-aggressive coward

This is the second time I have quoted you on this.

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/22/19

RGoss99 said:

Note you have not provided a sample of my post where I said she was a coward.

See above post.

TOP