Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Berry, you live for pissing people off. You know it's true.

That's not true atall. I love kittens.

Besides which, you're hosting a most astoundingly extreme defender of a top Jew-killing and Holocaust organising Nazi.

He's just lied again, claiming that Kurt Becher didn't take overall control of the death-camps until after Anne Frank was dead.

You gotta admit, I never provoked him into doing that, behind that smiling demeanour is a really evil person.

BerrySteph said:

That's not true at all. I love kittens.

HAH!

You can do both.

For whatever it is worth, I have no idea who Kurt Becher is, and I really don't care.

That's cool - you don't want to be reminded of unpunished crimes.

Not American ones - but not Nazi crimes very corruptly forgiven by the Zionists either.

BerrySteph said:

That's cool - you don't want to be reminded of unpunished crimes.

Forget "reminded" - I've never even heard of this guy.

But you are clearly obsessed with him, so I guess he shot JFK on orders from Hitler (secretly still alive), who was working with the Zionists preparing to fake the Moon landing?

WOW! I missed this whole disturbance in the Force.  Never realized I had been called a "coward".

Should tell that one to my family who know me better, but they would merely disdain to acknowledge the perpetrator of this fallacy. LOL

RGoss99 said:

So why are you still posting unrequested posts still -- slow learning curve I guess.

Uhm, are YOUR posts requested here? Is there a barrage of people asking for your rating method?

(Sorry, everyone else, if it prolongs this, just had to say the temerity of his remark was unbelievable)

G=G+1 you seem to forget, that my marking system, not rating, is simply a response to posts sent to me, that are either off topice or non responsive to my posts.

In addition, unless you are some sort of god, your "everyone" is an absolute, which is false  if one person is not included. Your use of it suggests some insecurity on your part, implying that your opinion, in your mind, is not significant unless you can back it up with your imaginary "everyone". Any valid opion you might have is sufficient on its own unless challenged and you can back it up with some facts if asked.

Since this is not a valid response to my post, nor is it on topic as in "U.K. News" it is simply an example of trolling on your part, which suggests you should get a real life.

Apologizing to "Everyone else", meaning those that have been tortured with the explanations of your rating system on this thread. Are you so dense to think that anyone else in the world would even care about it?

Methinks that you protest too much about some sort of god, as you have set yourself up as a judge. Why don't you leave your "criteria" behind, and just try to have a discussion like a normal person.

We don't need an invented ranking system for our opinions and posts. You may rank them from the most stenchy to the least, in your own head, but your rank, classify, order is not appropriate in a forum that is not your own.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Forget "reminded" - I've never even heard of this guy.

No reason you should have heard of Kurt Becher - I'm not sure I had until Adwil tried to defend Rudolf Kastner, the Zionist in Budapest who successfully tricked 457,000 Hungarian Jews into boarding the trains direct to the Auschwitz gas-chambers.

This important part of the Holocaust was in May/June/July 1944 when the Wehrmacht was crumbling and in absolutely no position to fight an uprising many times bigger than the Warsaw Ghetto fighting.

The suspicion must be that something similar happened in every ghetto in Europe - Zionists used their access to leaders of the Jewish communities to help the Germans rob the Jews and murder the millions of Jews they'd dispossessed.

G=G+1 for ignoring that this is not a rating system, just a short hand way of informing people who have already been asked not to post certain types of message to me, that they are ignoring my detailed messge. Using a short hand version (G=G+1) is a quick way, without punishing my self by having to repeat that I have a problem with the message as already explained, and an invitation to that person to justify repeating what I have already objected to. The only implied torture, is people repeating what they have been politely asked not to. If the "G" post seems like torture to them , the easiest way to stop the imaginary torture, is not to post to me in ways alredy described, as this last one considering that it is ignoring a response already given.

If you were a normal person, you would have already accepted my response, and ceased this off topic (UK News) thread hijacking. and stop posting to it. You seem to think that I have no right to object to posts, when I give a reason for my objecting. Having my secretary vetting my mail, and following my criteria rejecting that which is unacceptible is simply self defense and saves me a lot of time, energy, and agrvation. If a parent tells a child "no", and the child refuses to accept his, simply repeating "no" is simply playing the child´s game and leads no where, except encouraging the child to continue his misbehavior. You are acting like a child, by refusing to cease send posts to me which you already know I do not want to recieve. The only valid way of continuing this thread hijacking would be to give an example of a post that I labeled "G" and justify why you think this was wrong of me to do so.