Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 1241
    MEMBERS
  • 62758
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

The debate on Climate Change   General Confusion

Started 7/18/17 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 192622 views.

You want to recheck your math there?

DARN! I hate it when I do dumb stuff like that!

My wife, however, loves it!

Reuters is an excellent news source.

Yet, you continually use that trash s.b.s. and a.b.c.!

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/21/20

Make Dems Cry Again 2020! (bobrazz) said:

Reuters is an excellent news source.

Yet, you continually use that trash s.b.s. and a.b.c.!

And their source is Reuters or Associated Press.  Some stories come direct from foreign correspondents living in the cities.

The source of the article is cited at the bottom, or a link to a bio on the reporter.

In reply toRe: msg 778
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/21/20

Here's the quote from reuters;

The hottest air temperature recorded anywhere on the planet in at least a century, and possibly ever, 

It took me all of 30 seconds to find that the record was not 130 degrees but 134 degrees in 1913. You're saying we shouldn't expect a good journalist to be able to do the same? "and possibly ever"?

come.... on.... man.....

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/22/20

Make Dems Cry Again 2020! (bobrazz) said:

Here's the quote from reuters;

The hottest air temperature recorded anywhere on the planet in at least a century, and possibly ever, It took me all of 30 seconds to find that the record was not 130 degrees but 134 degrees in 1913.

You're saying we shouldn't expect a good journalist to be able to do the same? "and possibly ever"?

Bob, it's 2020. The hottest day before that was 107 years ago.

Last I checked, that's "at least a century".

"Possibly ever" is perfectly reasonable, as temperature gauges were not as precise 107 years ago - though it is definitely wrong, as the earth was once nothing but molten rock in a coalescing solar system.

If everyone that does sloppy, or dishonest, work has people like you making excuses for them can we reasonably expect those results to change?

For decades women in hollywood seemed to suffer men taking advantage of them sexually. Was that because they spoke out, immediately and loudly, about it when it happened, or, because they made excuses for it?

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/23/20

Bob... I gave you a mathematically correct reply to your claim that 107 years is less than a century.

Be a man and accept you made a mistake.

Make Dems Cry Again 2020! (bobrazz) said:

For decades women in hollywood seemed to suffer men taking advantage of them sexually. Was that because they spoke out, immediately and loudly, about it when it happened, or, because they made excuses for it?

Nice random deflection.

Bob... I gave you a mathematically correct reply to your claim that 107 years is less than a century.

Be a man and accept you made a mistake.

I have had it with you. You are clearly insane and/or simply evil. You're dishonest, and a perfect example of what liberalism can do to people if they allow it. HERE WAS MY RESPONSE TO THAT CATCH;

From:  Make Dems Cry Again 2020! (bobrazz) Aug-20 9:02 AM 
To:  Jenifer (Zarknorph) DelphiPlus Member Icon   (776 of 783) 
  86.776 in reply to 86.774 
 

You want to recheck your math there?

DARN! I hate it when I do dumb stuff like that!

My wife, however, loves it!

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

8/24/20

Wrong post.

That was a completely different miscalculation.

TOP