Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 924
    MEMBERS
  • 53200
    MESSAGES
  • 17
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Trump vs the Courts   America - all of it

Started 10/8/19 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 5516 views.
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Aug-23

In reply toRe: msg 34
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Oct-25

In reply toRe: msg 35
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

Good thing we have a full Supreme Court so there's no tie.

As it should. In an election this close states must be held accountable to obeying both federal laws and their own laws in the handling of election ballots. In 2,000 the FL supreme court failed to enforce FL law which resulted in different standards being applied in different counties. In MI federal law requires each party have access to the counting but that was not upheld. In PA standards of identification of the voter were being ignored.

 

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host
1776 (MRCROSSROADS) said:

Good thing we have a full Supreme Court so there's no tie.

Bad thing that Kavanaugh is proving he has no clue what he is doing.

Bad thing that Kavanaugh is proving he has no clue what he is doing.

How so? He is one of the most respected jurists in this country. Have you not finished with your "lynching" of this fine husband, father, jurist?

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

He cited, specifically, the 2000 election Supreme Court ruling as reason for precedence, despite the findings of that case SPECIFICALLY stating they could never be cited in the future as a precedent.

He cited, specifically, the 2000 election Supreme Court ruling as reason for precedence, despite the findings of that case SPECIFICALLY stating they could never be cited in the future as a precedent.

Since I have no quotes I have to do my research for you and found an article. He DID NOT STATE what you claimed here; https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/27/politics/bush-gore-cnn-interview-brett-kavanaugh/index.html

He STATED that Article II is clear. The state legislatures have the Constitutional authority to set the rules as they see fit. Not state courts. Bush v Gore ruled that the FL Supreme court unconstitutionally allowed those rules to be changed by local precincts after the election was held. That fact was agreed to 7-2. The 6-5 decision had to do only with the remedy.

The bush v gore ruling did not state it could not be used as precedent. That is simply a lie.

It's your choice to take propaganda as fact, without any research into the veracity of it. It's a bad choice for rational people to make, but you are free to do it!

I take it you, also, enjoyed that lynching of that fine husband, fine father, well respected jurist!

 

TOP