Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
5893 messages in 177 discussions
Latest 8/26/21 by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
827 messages in 16 discussions
Latest Feb-16 by kitchenlawn
17321 messages in 772 discussions
Latest Feb-5 by pitirre62
Not one named source. Oh, excuse me - John Kelly, not exactly a friend of Trump. If you care to do a little more exploration, you'll find that the people that were with Trump during the trip to the cemetery said the reports of what he said were untrue.
I don't remember the articles or where I saw them, (I read a lot), but I'm sure you can find them if you try.
Katie I know you are amongst Trump's fans, but I will take John Kelly's word over those of the sycophants he chose to have around him in Paris.
No one is blinder than those who do not want to see.
P.S. when Foxnews confirms even you should give some thought.
It's not the only time he called members of the military losers.
And the exact phrasing was "losers".
He has demonstrated that he repeats himself over and over, always using the same insults.
Now - playing Devil's Advocate - his vocabulary is limited. It is possible he was trying to express the sheer and utter pointlessness of the first world war. On this, we agree.
Millions of soldiers died so needlessly due to strategic incompetence, all starting with some Archduke getting killed.
Also, Trump lashes out when he is feeling threatened or belittled.
I believe he said it, because it is in his character.
Would you call John Bolton a Trump sycophant? Since Di has already decided anyone else who was with Trump at the time and defended him are lying, I'm not even going to suggest you research it. Unnamed sources are always the best sources for truthful material, aren't they?
Would you call John Bolton a Trump sycophant?
But more than that, he put his hatred of the Democrats ahead of his love for his country.
He could have testified at the impeachment, but he did not want to give the Democrats a win.
Unnamed sources are always the best sources for truthful material, aren't they?
The second a journalist gives up a source without their consent is the same second that journalism dies.
> "I am a good shot with the baton round as well......I shall let you figure it out!"
Is that a threat?
HUH? You really are one self opinionated and paranoid person, aren't you!
> "HUH? You really are one self opinionated and paranoid person, aren't you!"
Sez the Al Capone wannabe. Are your fingers getting cold?
Maybe - you have a screw loose - too?