BerrySteph said:

The phrase "Jews cannot be Germans" (I don't even know what it is in German) may have been used by Nazis - we seem to have no evidence for that (which is pretty mysterious).

The LIAR  prick has used and lied the above quote so many times it is incredible and now faced with facts he is f..ked totally as usual

BM

BerrySteph said:

I may or may not be able to trash the rest of your falsehoods right now, there is only one thing that needs immediate response: The phrase "Jews cannot be Germans" (I don't even know what it is in German) may have been used by Nazis - we seem to have no evidence for that (which is pretty mysterious). What we know, from passionate Zionist Black, is that the Zionists were pleased with it and used it. And we have evidence, from kosher sources, that Chaim Weizmann and the other Zionists were expressing this openly in 1919/1920. Chaim Weizmann and the other Zionists saw the refugees of WW1 and wanted them in Palestine with the blessing and money of the British. Huge efforts by the British until 1925 to make this work ended in failure and by 1930 the ghastly experiment was failing. That's why the Zionists set about destroying Germany unless it would expel the Jews.

Present some evidence. 

bml00 said:

"has used and lied the above quote so many times it is incredible and now faced with facts he is f..ked totally as usual"

He's been given the reference to it but is still in denial.

The idiot has buggered off as usual his one time favourite "Jews cant be Germans" must be a real bummer to get shown up time and time and time again

BM

Maybe I should butt out, but I am having difficulty understanding this thread. “Jews cannot be Germans”

I once played chess with a man in Kiel Germany who was very proud of his Judaism. 
 

As I perceive things, Jewish is a faith and heritage, German is a nationality- why wouldn’t someone be able to be both?

George Of The Jungle (GOTJ1) said:

As I perceive things, Jewish is a faith and heritage, German is a nationality- why wouldn’t someone be able to be both?

Of course, they should be and are both. 

The slogan is historical from  1930s Germany when the Nazis were trying to turn the German population against Jewish Germans. 

Yes, you'd have thought he'd have adjusted. 

adwil said:

I was momentarily pleased to see an accurate (and referenced) quote from Arendts 'Eichmann in Jerusalem'.   

90% of my assertions and quotes are referenced - and from pro-Zionist sources.

Not so for the real origin of "Jews cannot be Germans", which is still something I was hoping to discover. But your linking it to the Nazis in 1934 is stupid and irrelevant when I've already got it coming from the leader of the Zionists in March 1933 (ie before Hitler had lifted a finger against the Jews).

adwil said:

Then you spoil it all with a stupid piece of anti-Semitism which shows your true motivation.  

I'm not interested in the Jews, except as examples of people victimised by the Nazis - and by the Zionists.

My motivation is to learn the lessons of WW1 and WW2 and try to see that nothing like that happens again.

Your motivation seems to be to deny the evil of the Zionists - while BMs is to incite fear and hatred of Jews.

Hannah Arendt was a serious Zionist philosopher and strikes me as being obsessed with racism. She took it as an article of faith that Jews cannot be Germans. She was still quite clear about it years after the war.

adwil said:

He'll just repeat the same assertions next time he addresses this subject.

I'll repeat two major asssertions I've made in here - that the Gaon of Vilna cannot possibly have driven Zionism since his works were lost for the crucial 188 years.

Hence, BM's assertion that "where as mainstream Judaism had accepted that Jews could not return to Israel BEFORE the arrival of the Messiah The Gaon saw that in fact Jews must be in Israel prior to the arrival of the Messiah" is unproven and unlikely - and irrelevant to his thesis that the Gaon contributed to any part of the creation of Israel.

And if David Irving cheated much in his histories, you've been unable to show me any examples. Every "historian" of WW2 (certainly for the first 30 years) say nothing about the Holocaust!

adwil said:

Present some evidence. 

I present you what Hannah Arendt said long after the war:

... On October 28, 1964, the following conversation between Hannah Arendt and Giinter Gaus, at the time a well-known journalist and later a high official in Willy Brandt's government, was broadcast on West German television. The interview was awarded the Adolf Grimme Prize and was published the following year under the title "Wasbleibt? Es bleibt die Muttersprache" in Giinter Gaus, ZurPerson, Munich, 1965.

This English translation is by Joan Stambaugh.

ARENDT: My mother was not a very theoretical person. ... Of course she was a Jew. She would never have baptized me! I think she would have boxed my ears right and left if she had ever found out that I had denied being a Jew. ... when I was grown up it was much more important for my mother than in her earlier life. But that was due to external circumstances.

I myself, for example, don't believe that I have ever considered myself a German - in the sense of belonging to the people as opposed to being a citizen, if I may make that distinction. I remember discussing this with [Professor] jaspers around 1930. He said, "Of course you are German!" I said, "One can see that I am not!" But that didn't bother me. I didn't feel that it was something inferior. That wasn't the case at all.

Published in "Sozialistische Monatshefte", a well-known Germanjournal of the time. - ed.

Now, overwhelmingly, German Jews rejected Zionism and felt themselves to be German - but Hannah Arendt was a Zionist. She didn't feel German and she was loud in her belief that Jews could not be Germans.

And this is what leads me to say that the Zionists were preaching "Jews cannot be Germans" and had probably done so since 

These people tell us that a version of "Jews cannot be Germans" was mainstream Zionist in 1920.

Nazi Propaganda was Based on What Zionists Said

... In 1920 there were statements hostile to Jews expressed at Heidelberg University. These statements, arguing that Jews of Germany had caused the turmoil that followed the war; that the Jews of Germany had nothing in common with Germans, and that Germans had the right to prevent the Jews of Germany from intruding into the affairs of their volk were not made by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf, but by Nahum Goldmann, who went in to become the President of the World Zionist Organization and head of the World Jewish Congress, and, indisputably, the most influential political Zionist in the world, second only to the Prime Minister of the State of Israel.

In 1921, Germans in Germany were told that:

"We Jews are aliens ... a foreign people in your midst and we ... wish to stay that way. A Jew can never be a loyal German; whoever calls the foreign land his Fatherland is a traitor to the Jewish people".

Who spoke these vile words? It was Jacob Klatzkin, the second of two political Zionist ideologists in Germany at the time, where the Jews of Germany were enjoying full political and civil rights. It was he who had advocated undermining Jewish communities as the one certain way of acquiring a state. "They had no qualms concerning tearing down the existing Jewish communities."

Who spoke in a public address at a political Zionist meeting in Berlin and declared that "Germany ... has too many Jews"? Was it Hitler or Goebbels? No, it was Chaim Weizman, later to become the first President of the State of Israel. This address was published in 1920, and, thus, four years before Hitler had even written Mein Kampf.

... At the Nuremberg Trials of Major War Criminals, Nazi propagandist, Julius Streicher testified: "I did no more than echo what the leading Zionists had been saying", it is clear that he had told the truth. https://www.truetorahjews.org/zionism