el gringo (ramseylurker) said...

and for sure I have zero trust in any Palestinian "eye witnesses" sorry

 

Why my dear, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath, etc. . . . so you don't have any trust in those folks, eh . . . how come, lad . . .

================================

Post edit: see how simple that is, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath, etc. . . . 

Everyone - of course the lad didn't actually say that . . . just demonstrating the game he is playing - with selective editing . . .

8645 (RedBV) said...

el gringo (ramseylurker) said...

8645 (RedBV) said...

8645 (RedBV) said...

8645 (RedBV) said...

bi-national couples

First of all, I didn't say the above

Yes you did. Delphi's quote mechanism works better than your memory.

ROTFLMAO at ya, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath, etc., lying yer ass off, lad . . . it is quite clear to anyone reading my post what you quote is from the article provided and thus from the author(s) of the article . . . and it is not from me . . .

But hey, leave it to you to take a quirk of Delphi's quote feature . . . and try to play games with it, since you like to make false stuff up in your game playing, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath, etc. . . . 

What is this troll talking about?

Do you know?

Does he seriously not understand how Delphi's quoting mechanism works?

The ability to quote is a feature, not a quirk. 

ROTFLMAO at ya and you lying yer ass off and games of deception, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath . . . anyone using Delpi's quote feature knows that when you press the curly quote marks in the editing bar tools . . . it quotes the entire post being responded to. . . and if you wish to make it look like someone has said something they didn't . . . simply edit that quote by backspacing before and after the text you want to use . . . to make that false claim . . . which is what you did, son . . .

It's funny that you wish to play such games over the junk you try and pass off . . . that is so easily refuted, lad . . . 

Why is this troll lying?

On my PC, I have the option to select a quote.

On my android device...well...it's just weird, but things work rather nicely on my pc.

I must have said something that disturbed him, and that he wants to distract from.

ROTFLMAO at you lying yer ass off, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath . . . with you trying to play little miss innocent . . . it is games like your selective editing, that have gotten you on probation, gagged, etc. in several forums, lad . . . 

It is very simple - what you try and claim that I said . . . is from the content of the article that I provided . . . it is not a quote from me . . . not ta mention that in my post there is two different text colors . . . one being my words . . . and the other being the content of the article that provided . . . 

8645 (RedBV) said...

ROTFLMAO at you lying yer ass off, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath . . . with you trying to play little miss innocent . . . it is games like your selective editing, that have gotten you on probation, gagged, etc. in several forums, lad . . . 

It is very simple - what you try and claim that I said . . . is from the content of the article that I provided . . . it is not a quote from me . . . not ta mention that in my post there is two different text colors . . . one being my words . . . and the other being the content of the article that provided . . . 

Your post was nothing but an article.

The print was in black, just as in my quote.

Stop lying and stop trolling this thread.

8645 (RedBV) said...

ROTFLMAO at you lying yer ass off, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath . . . with you trying to play little miss innocent . . . it is games like your selective editing, that have gotten you on probation, gagged, etc. in several forums, lad . . . 

It is very simple - what you try and claim that I said . . . is from the content of the article that I provided . . . it is not a quote from me . . . not ta mention that in my post there is two different text colors . . . one being my words . . . and the other being the content of the article that provided . . . 

Your post was nothing but an article. The print was in black, just as in my quote. Stop lying and stop trolling this thread.

ROTFLMAO at you lying yer ass off, slackerx/ramsey/ricadomath, etc. . . . here is link to my post and the content -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.513

=================================

So an alternative to the above is 

Common Law Marriage -

https://www.newfamily.org.il/en/common-law-marriage/

In Israel, where there is no civil marriage, common law marriage is an alternative to religious marriage that the couple may not be eligible for or reject for ideological reasons. Since only a man and a woman of the same religion who are both citizens and residents of Israel can have a religious marriage in Israel, common-law marriage provides a legal alternative for gays, lesbians, interfaith and bi-national couples, women denied a divorce, religiously taboo unions, people who are religiously prohibited from marrying, people who don’t meet the religious definition of any faith, and more.

===================================

So, as anyone can see there is three different colors in my post . . . the color of this text being my words . . . the blue color of the link to the article . . . and the black text of the article that I quoted from the article . . . and as highlighted about happens to be the text that you try and falsely claim that I supposedly said, lad . . . 

So, slackerx/ramsey/recardomath, etc. . . . once again you've been shown to be the liar, game player, troll, etc. that you happen ta be, son . . . which as indicated has gotten you on probation, gagged, etc. in a number of forums, son . . . 

8645 (RedBV) said...

So an alternative to the above is 

Common Law Marriage -

https://www.newfamily.org.il/en/common-law-marriage/

In Israel, where there is no civil marriage, common law marriage is an alternative to religious marriage that the couple may not be eligible for or reject for ideological reasons. Since only a man and a woman of the same religion who are both citizens and residents of Israel can have a religious marriage in Israel, common-law marriage provides a legal alternative for gays, lesbians, interfaith and bi-national couples, women denied a divorce, religiously taboo unions, people who are religiously prohibited from marrying, people who don’t meet the religious definition of any faith, and more.

Common-Law marriage is an especially attractive alternative since New Family’s advocacy and litigation has generated judicial interpretations and policy changes that made common law marriage a status virtually equal to marriage. Common law couples might have been married in a civil or religious ceremony that is not recognized by the state-such as a Reform or Conservative Jewish marriage that is not recognized in Israel-or signed a shared living agreement or simply live together without a written agreement.

The growing popularity of common law relationships is part of a global trend. In Europe and North America, marriage rates have steadily declined and more and more couples live together without formal marriage. In Israel, an estimated 180,000 couples live together in common law marriage, 45% of which have anchored their relationship in a legal contract.

Legal Status

Common law relationships are not registered by the Interior Ministry and the personal status of the partners remains ‘single’. Yet. common-law partners can prove their eligibility for status and rights equal to married couples with Domestic Union Cards™ and contractual marriage.

Common law relationships are often anchored in a share living agreement that details the partnership between the two individuals and gives judicial authority to the relationship. Having a legal agreement eases the process by which a couple receives social benefits and clearly establishes the rights and obligations within the relationship and for its dissolution in the event of separation. ...

This is the article. It's all in black.

I don't know why the troll won't stop.

el gringo (ramseylurker) said...

bi-national couples

Note that common law marriages are being advised for bi-national couples, here.

I've never heard of something so monumentally stupid in my entire life.

Any lawyer who actually gave such advice to a bi-national couple would likely be disbarred.

el gringo (ramseylurker) said...

 

8645 (RedBV) said...

So an alternative to the above is 

Common Law Marriage -

https://www.newfamily.org.il/en/common-law-marriage/

In Israel, where there is no civil marriage, common law marriage is an alternative to religious marriage that the couple may not be eligible for or reject for ideological reasons. Since only a man and a woman of the same religion who are both citizens and residents of Israel can have a religious marriage in Israel, common-law marriage provides a legal alternative for gays, lesbians, interfaith and bi-national couples, women denied a divorce, religiously taboo unions, people who are religiously prohibited from marrying, people who don’t meet the religious definition of any faith, and more.

Common-Law marriage is an especially attractive alternative since New Family’s advocacy and litigation has generated judicial interpretations and policy changes that made common law marriage a status virtually equal to marriage. Common law couples might have been married in a civil or religious ceremony that is not recognized by the state-such as a Reform or Conservative Jewish marriage that is not recognized in Israel-or signed a shared living agreement or simply live together without a written agreement.

The growing popularity of common law relationships is part of a global trend. In Europe and North America, marriage rates have steadily declined and more and more couples live together without formal marriage. In Israel, an estimated 180,000 couples live together in common law marriage, 45% of which have anchored their relationship in a legal contract.

Legal Status

Common law relationships are not registered by the Interior Ministry and the personal status of the partners remains ‘single’. Yet. common-law partners can prove their eligibility for status and rights equal to married couples with Domestic Union Cards™ and contractual marriage.

Common law relationships are often anchored in a share living agreement that details the partnership between the two individuals and gives judicial authority to the relationship. Having a legal agreement eases the process by which a couple receives social benefits and clearly establishes the rights and obligations within the relationship and for its dissolution in the event of separation. ...

This is the article. It's all in black.

I don't know why the troll won't stop.

 

========================================

Providing a copy of the lads post . . . since he has a habit of posting something and then going back and changing his post as to context, etc. . . .

8645 (RedBV) said...

bi-national couples

This is the part you are so desperately trying to hide with your trolling.

You posted an article talking about common law marriages for bi-national couples, and you are doing everything you can to keep this from being noticed.

As soon as I quoted it, you realized how stupid the idea was on its face.

This is the article. It's all in black. 

LMAO at you still lying yer ass off, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath . . . that was not the whole of your claim, son . . . here is what you claimed -

"Your post was nothing but an article."

As you're very own post now shows that is not the truth, son . . . as anyone can see there is more in my post than what you try and claim . . . i.e. my very own words in the same color of text as these words here . . . as well the blue color of the link to the article . . . and in addition toward the end of the first paragraph of the article (in black) happens to be the words that you falsely claim that I supposedly said, lad . . . 

In other words, slackerx/ramsey/ricardomath, etc. . . . yer lying yer ass off . . . and it is quite clear that you selectively edited the context of my post that you quoted . . . to make the false claim that I supposedly said something that I did not say, lad . . . when the fact is that what you claimed is actually part of the article that I provided . . .

Though it is quite comical the extent of deceptive and lying games that you will go to . . . to try and cover yer ass, son . . .