Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
7268 messages in 177 discussions
Latest 2/16/21 by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
4896 messages in 209 discussions
Latest Mar-16 by MelanGEE
Latest Mar-11 by PTG (anotherPTG)
5892 messages in 176 discussions
Latest Mar-14 by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Feb-28 by Harold27Z
Latest Feb-23 by NISSY (NISSY2)
754 messages in 15 discussions
Latest Mar-13 by ElDotardo
17297 messages in 766 discussions
Latest Mar-1 by OSarge (AKA Finkle) (mahjong54)
Latest Feb-23 by Alm (JurgensenAlm)
Latest Feb-23 by Alm (JurgensenAlm)
As to supposidly putting me in my place, I consider it this way. Ceertain places here have aggressive dogs who don´t know me, so they bark a lot. I am not insulted or put in my place because that is what dogs do. Since the humans who have a need to be insulting have no status in my life, their "barking" says more about them ten me.
Adding, when I see their feeble attempts, these have no affect on me, but usually I miss most of these because when my secretary sees them first, she uses the "G" macro, so they usually disappear from my in box before I have a chance to see them.
Same lack of logic against Blacks voting on civil rights but in reverse. There is a direct link between the creation of the state of Israel and, 9-11, and world terrorism. So being a Jew does not give you any special rights in this debate.
Your logic is flawed as usual , this is about Israel not 9/11 or how to grow cucumbers or world terrorism or what color panties you wear.
This is not about Americans of color or is about Italians or Spanish , it is certainly not about You as You are not an Israeli
but usually I miss most of these because when my secretary sees them first, she uses the "G" macro, so they usually disappear from my in box before I have a chance to see them.
Delphi? Walt? gunter? Lyndy? Rusty? Echo...echo...echo...Pinch hitting...for Pedro Borbon...Manny Mota...Mota...Mota...!
this is about Israel not 9/11 ... or world terrorism
Sure is about terrorism - Israel almost entirely the source of it!
In my experience most terrorists who are not simply crazies, usually publish some sort of declaration giving their action some rational. It might be a good Ida for BM to read these and figure what percentage do not have the state of Israel mentioned or implied. American support has allowed the stte of Israel to survive, America arms Israel, with no strings attached. Some indigenous Pasestinias, there clan, co-religious are not happy with what Israel does with those weapons and some times the result is a terrorist act. how can BM deny that there is a connection? On the U.S. side if there was a simple contract, a lot of current world problems would go away. Simply say the U.S. believes in your right to exist, and to support this here are some defenive weapons to be used only within your treaty guaranteed borders. However if one is used in what I call "Israeli occupied Palestine", there will be no more weapons, ammunition, maintenance or satelite support, and you will be on your own.
how can BM deny that there is a connection?
Seems to me that BM is taking the supremacist route. He wants there to be more and more trouble.
And in fact, he declared it himself, he is dedicated to "Eternal Conflict". Not clever.
Nevertheless, I can see he's in a bind - what I cannot understand is the hangers-on. Some of who must be pathological.
G=G+1 unsupported opinión that does not match any dictionary I have seen Yes originally at its source you would be correct, but currently both the English and its Spanish cognate have undergon the same shift from an absolute, to a matter of degree. In other words the English crit I posted, is no different then the way the Word is used in Spanish. One term for the process is meaning invlation, where what was more absolute or more anything in both languages is becomming less so so you can have "mes unicament" which literally as you say is not logical, but that is the way language progresses.
The majority of Jews are not Israeli either, I expected you to disagre, but I can not respect your disagreement, unless you support it with some facts or logic, specifying where my logic seems flawed in your mind. "As usual" (unqualified put down) you fail to support your position with anything more then eing a selfidentified Jew, which includes the unqualified assumption that your concept of Jewishness is shared by the majority of not all of the imaginary self identified Jews. G=G+1