Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
657 messages in 38 discussions
Latest 6/20/20 by CzoeMC
17252 messages in 763 discussions
Latest Jan-18 by OSarge (mahjong54)
Latest Jan-5 by OSarge (mahjong54)
4890 messages in 209 discussions
Latest Jan-2 by OSarge (mahjong54)
You've attacked RGoss (and me).
Yes I have.
I lose my temper and lash out.
Doesn't mean anything the way you've applied it. Talking about the Middle East or terrorism - but demand everyone ignore the elephant in the room.
You are free to discuss the Middle East until the scared cows come home.
Just not in a thread devoted to UK culture.
Would you like to know how many threads you have derailed?
Stating it just makes you look like a control-freak.
I am a control freak. I freely admit it.
I am allowed to set rules at the door of my forum.
All I ask is that you respect them.
I am not sure that was correct , it was not thesex act or his defiance in describing the event it was more that he lied blatantly that was the creation of his problems
That would be a valid point if Jenifer preposted explecit rules and followed them herself and was consistant in her judgement.
I have shown you the rules a dozen times.
Here is one more, just for you.
Thoughtful. Considerate. Colourful. Sassy. Witty. Irreverent.
Please Don't be:
Abusive. A hijacker. A troll. A sock.
Attack the argument, not the person.
All links and Signatures welcome. Feel free to promote your forum.
The Hostess With The Mostess May move your thread to a different folder;
but she will never censor you.
All opinions are welcome here.
However - Hijacking is not tolerated. I don't care how passionate you feel about a topic; a thread devoted to pictures of adorable kittens is not the place to start an argument about the Holocaust.
You get three warnings, then you're gagged for a week.
SPAM will be deleted on sight. This includes "automated responses". Your macro system may be ingenious to you, but it's SPAM to everyone else.
Also, Godwin's Law applies here, and the penalty is ridicule.
The question that he was asked should not have been asked in the first place. It was a spin off from a Republican initiated imaginary sexual encounter when he was governor, nothing to do with the investigation authorized by the special counsil in the first place. Basicly everything that the Democrats are being accused of in Trump´s case, except that the Democrats are pushing a real presidential related violation.
Sorry Jennifer but this post documents your lack of fitness to be a moderator because even though you can´t define how these terms applyto me, you are guilty of all of them. In fact this off topic post of yours is itself a hijacking of a conversation between BM and I.
Until your rules have aggeed upon definition they are not only invalid but unenforceable. For example: I asked for your definition of "troll" and supplied mine. You never responded with a definition at all, much less one that fit your discription of me being a troll, which by my definition makes you, no me, the troll.
Call me ignorant (I don't mind) but I had to look up Godwin's Law.
Berry's Law/Rule: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Zionists or the Holocaust approaches 1."
Forums have moderators not owners, this is Delphi´s space which you are abusing because you are not qualified to be a moderator, and your lashing out is just another example of your hysterical behavior as a result.
If no hijacking is a rule, why do you send me so many examples of your hijacking,
You are abusive.
You are a troll.
You send automated responses in the form of a macro.
Threads often wander off topic. There is no harm in that.
However, there is a difference between a discussion meandering off course organically, and a complete 180 because Berry decided to once again post a cut and paste article about Zionists.