Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

this is my little corner of cyberspace and when people come in and shit all over it for nothing more than their own amusement, I get defensive.

Why do you allow fraudsters to strut their stuff - and even defend them?

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Attack the argument, not the person.

I do that very successfully across a range of topics.

You ignore those discussions and butter up the fraudsters.

MEDDLY said:

Berry's Law/Rule: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Zionists or the Holocaust approaches 1."

If you don't like terrorism, stop promoting it.

SO MUCH BOLLOCKS IN ONE POST

     END OF DEBATE

bml00 said:

SO MUCH BOLLOCKS IN ONE POST      END OF DEBATE

When will you deliver on very, very most solemn promises you made in May 1949 when you were accepted into the UN?

>>I apologise.<<

And, that my friend, is why they ignore you and carry on as they do.

SQUADDYB said:

And, that my friend, is why they ignore you and carry on as they do.

Perhaps.

But I will never stop trying to be a better person.

At least I can corral their bullshit into one thread each.

Technology News

Professor Berry Putz has as much a clue about Space X as he does about the skid marks in his old underwear

bm

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Professor Berry Putz has as much a clue about Space X as he does about the skid marks in his old underwear

I think your moon-shot went wrong very early on. There was huge excitement for 36 hours but some very worrying features reported. The rocket hadn't fired correctly and the navigation was dazzled.

Then there was nothing for a week, when you announced you got within seconds of success.

Lastly there was a photograph of a grazing impact crater, as could be absolutely anything.

And an announcement that no matter what a sensationally good Israeli invented system this was you'd not be attempting it again.

I detect Cardboard Bicycle syndrome again.

You'll need to talk to BM about it.