Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
640 messages in 12 discussions
Latest Jun-29 by ElDotardo
2379 messages in 120 discussions
Latest Jun-21 by ElDotardo
4881 messages in 208 discussions
Latest Jun-19 by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Jun-3 by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Jun-2 by CamGeary
17076 messages in 745 discussions
Latest 10/24/21 by katiek2
Latest Jun-16 by ElDotardo
Latest Jun-13 by ricardomath
Latest Jun-11 by David Finkel(ish) (mahjong54)
Which Warren are you defending, the headline-hunting DA of Alameda County, the anti-Japanese governor, the guy who ran as VP on the Dewey ticket in 1948? You'll get no argument from me if you restrict your defense to his term on the Supreme Court...
As I said earlier, I never brought Earl Warren into the conversation, in any context, so no need on my part to defend any who Warren wherever, whatever for.
*Seems that you have a complex about a Warren. Got too many rabbits up your hole?
Oh, got it Cam, you just want to pick a fight with me, and decided it would be about Earl Warren, but I'm not playing your game, boyo.
If you really want to fence, have the guts to start your own discussion topic, write rude and uninformed statements as usual, then I shall join the fray. Sharpen your pitiful weapons.
Maybe your first discussion thread should be "Why I hate Earl Warren"!
OH Oh, if you are incapable of starting a "Discussion", I would be most pleased to help you through the process, OR even open one for you (attribution to yourself, of course).
*To all, apologies for the many edits of my posts. Had to tone down some angry verbiage.
CzoeMC said...Got too many rabbits up your hole?
No, just you...
Ooooh, ticklish when poked...
You're a poker from way back...
A poker, and a pokee!!!
Some can take it, and some get all distoibed. It kind of depends on how defensible ones arguments are, and yours, so far, are not.
CzoeMC said...and yours, so far, are not.
And yet I survive...