Nah, there would not be a problem in that regard . . . promotion and attacking are two different items . . .

The only possible problem would be a forum provided for folks ta go at one another . . . which there are on Delphi . . . inherently a forum that provides itself for that inherently provides for attacking using whatever can be brought to bear . . . no holds barred, except for staying within TOS . . . I happen to have one of them . . .

As well in that previous large forum mentioned to you . . . we set up a folder specifically for folks ta go at one another . . . ta have access folks had to virtually sign they gave up pretty much most all TOS protections . . . worked out pretty well - when folks were getting out of hand they were told ta take their battle to that folder . . . if they refused and tried to continue in the open forum they paid the piper . . .

So you admit to hosting a forum where anyone can call anyone else anything they want?

Are you upset no one is visiting it, because all the trouble makers I have not locked out are here?

LMAO at you and your intentional mis-rep of what was provided to you . . . but not surprised at you doing so . . .

There is your violation for today, Jen . . .

I have never said or called his wife an illegal . . . nor have I picked on Black folks or Indigenous folks . . .

It is trolling posts, false and erroneous accusations from the joker, like that that have gotten real old . . .

Anyway . . .

You goaded him, taunted him, insulted him and now you get him gagged for a week.

Don't make claims you can't back up, Jen . . . in fact I challenge you to try and back up your above claim . . .

8645 (RedBV) said:

Don't make claims you can't back up, Jen . . . in fact I challenge you to try and back up your above claim . . .

My pleasure.  Start with a simple post count search of every time you called him 'lad' in the past week.  It is something that annoys him.  You know it annoys him.  But you do it anyway, because you know it gets a rise out of him.

The result is 54.  Here are some samples.

Second search: "Yawn"

This is your version of Goss' Macro.  You drag slacker into my forum with the promise of a response, only to post the word "Yawn." If you were truly disinterested in his post, then you would ignore it and don't bother replying.  You do this to show how much contempt you have, and to ensure you get the last word.  

That's 20.  So you posted around 3 macros a day.

Your full of shit . . . calling him lad or son is simply showing him the like derision of him that he shows me . . . and have stated that, to include to him . . . if he doesn't like derision directed at him, then he shouldn't do so to others . . .

As well -

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/321072/why-is-a-young-man-called-son-but-a-young-woman-is-never-called-daughter

That link also provided to slackerx . . .

In addition- from your start page -

Also, Godwin's Law applies here, and the penalty is ridicule.

Are you now trying to claim that when someone posts what is similar and or akin to . . . that the poster who does so is now not subject to ridicule and the like, eh Jen . . .

As to yawn . . . that is a typical response on the forums to someone when the poster posts false crap . . . and you know that, Jen . . .

All in all, Jen, try again . . . cause you've failed . . .

8645 (RedBV) said...

Also, Godwin's Law applies here, and the penalty is ridicule.

The above post, linked to this post . . . shows just how much respect slackerx/ramseylurker (the same person) has for your rules and you having gagged him . . .

Also, remember you've admitted to me you know they are the same person . . .

You owe some folks an apology, Jen . . .

The above post is to you, Jen