Chief of Staff (at that time) discusses the Israeli attacks on Iran and Hezbollah in SYRIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lUNaES_4xg

It will be interesting to see exactly how many wars now seem futile and unwinnable now that oil is worthless.

Oil is one commodity but WATER is another

BM

Absolutely.

The final world war will be over that.

Which is why, in Minnesota, with all our fresh water, we are trying to stop a foreign copper mining company with a bad history of pollution from trying to mine in the pristine Boundary Waters.

And also trying to prevent the dry desert states from trying to pipe our water to Arizona, etc, so they can grow grass on their lawns.

We all have our battles.

Here, I align myself with Native Americans who respect the Earth, but also had tribal arguments about who's land is your land, who's land is my land. (Apologies for the sarcasm, and Woody Guthrie). Until they were invaded and put in reservations by Europeans, who seem most content to exploit and destroy the very planet that we live.

If humans are to continue to exist, as a species, we should look at the "canary in the coal mine", at the animals lost, and ask ourselves, in a global quorum about how to deal with killing everything off except for the cockroaches.

I actually had a short conversation with an epidemiologist about this about three years ago. He said that what what the world needed to survive was a pandemic like this. I told him my theory that humans overpopulation on the earth seemed like a virus to the health of Gaea, and that maybe we would be thinned out.

He agreed, and said, "well, that might include us, though". I nodded.

You seem to find it funny to have a really serious and determined defender of a top Nazi war-criminal in here.

bml00 said:

Chief of Staff (at that time) discusses the Israeli attacks on Iran and Hezbollah in SYRIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lUNaES_4xg

No Nazi war-monger ever boasted of attacks on its helpless neighbours like this.

Over and over again, the terrorists destroying the Middle East (and the world) say the same thing - Saddam is the problem, Gaddafi is the problem, the Taliban are the problem, Ho Chi Minh was the problem.

Hamas is the problem, Hezbollah are the problem, Assad is the problem, the Ayatollahs are the problem.

The communists are the problem, Islamics are the problem, Bernie Sanders is a threat to your way of life.

Putin is the problem, Castro is/was the problem. Kim Jong-Un is the problem. Absurdly gentle and defenceless Jeremy Corbyn was an existential threat to the Jews living in the UK. Jimmy Carter was the spawn of the devil.

Chairman Xi is a monstrous and disgusting tyrant who's just too big to handle at the moment.

When in fact, its sick fukks like you and rogue nations with WMD which are the problem.

BerrySteph said:

You seem to find it funny to have a really serious and determined defender of a top Nazi war-criminal in here.

This is the point where I take the bait and say "No, he's not", and you proceed to dump your hijacking crap all over the thread, right?

Then you can't be accused of hijacking, because I initiated the change of topic?

Nope.  No hijacking.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Nope.  No hijacking.

Syria is a catastrophe, another part of Holocaust II.

The part that Israel and ourselves played in it has been covered up.

I post you facts and you jeer at them or delete them. 

This is more speculative and covers a wider field - but it would fascinate anyone not being rewarded for covering up really bad things.

Explain to me why the White Helmets were interested in such a mountain of propaganda fraud:

... For me, the most fascinating and insufficiently explored avenue of the Philip Cross affair was the question of his Twitter followers. “Philip Cross” had a twitter account which never did anything interesting. He simply retweeted articles by right wing journalists; that was the majority of his output. Very occasionally he would add a one line comment. There was nothing remotely original or interesting, even to a person who shared the right wing views of the “Philip Cross” persona, until the operation was exposed.

Yet this extremely dull twitter account by this obscure unwell man, which never tweeted anything original or witty, had among its 200 followers a collection of establishment figures and, most notably mainstream media journalists. Why on earth would Tristram Hunt and James le Mesurier of white helmet jihadis fame find it worthwhile to follow this obscure account? Above all, why did a whole slew of MSM “journalists” follow an account of no original interest at all?

There is no other possible conclusion than that these figures were aware of the “Philip Cross” operation when it was still apparently nothing but an extremely obscure man who liked obsessively editing Wikipedia and retweeting Nick Cohen and David Aaronovitch (his most frequent tweets). My intuition is – and this is not fact, but a working hypothesis that fits known facts to date – that the many MSM journalists who were, for no apparent reason, following the obscure “Philip Cross” twitter account, were not merely au fait with, but a part of, the Wikipedia editing operation that hid behind “Philip Cross” and his IP address. https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/04/information-wars/

Craig Murray has an article on sex slurs on himself, Assange, Scott Ritter and others - http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2010/12/ludicrous_attac/ - very telling.

And there's another case of these sex slurs just in the last few weeks - leader of the Scottish Nationalists, Alex Salmond was freed by a Scottish Jury. A lot of Scots very, very angry about that.

... Alex Salmond was of course an opponent of NATO bombing of Serbia and has been a staunch and outspoken opponent of UK military intervention in the Middle East. So who was editing negatively his Wikipedia profile? “Philip Cross” of course. https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/03/your-man-finally-in-the-public-gallery-the-alex-salmond-trial-day-8/