Try the British and New Zealand can you go further than that for colonizing and do you need any more examples of countries in Africa the British colonized ?

How many natives did the British kill that had muskets and cannons , very few if none , doubt Maori or the Aborigine had any?

British Guiana that was on the Empires door step was'nt it (nope it was not)

Uganada - Swaziland - Malawi - Nigeria - Ghana - Kenya - Botswana bet they all had loaded kiwi fruits to repel the Red Coats

Umpteen Islands in the West Indies and the Caribbean

You are such an idiot when you try to revise history

The British always used maximum force to ensure the Empire never retreated

BM

bml00 said:

Uganada - Swaziland - Malawi - Nigeria - Ghana - Kenya - Botswana bet they all had loaded kiwi fruits to repel the Red Coats

No fighting in Tanzania, Uganda, Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra leone, Gambia, Zambia, Nyasaland, Lesotho, Swaziland, Botswana or British Somaliland.

Fighting in = Kenya.

And we even know why there was fighting in Kenya - its because, most unusually, we'd introduced lots of settlers with guns.

Though we did this in a much bigger and more serious fashion in Palestine - to devastating effect.

You made a statement which was utterly false in every word every syllable .

You now claim there was no fighting and you expect anybody to believe You ?

How many colonies did the British take by force from the Germans or the French or how many campaigns were fought in Africa by the British??

BM

bml00 said:

You now claim there was no fighting and you expect anybody to believe You ?

There was no fighting in any of the 12 British colonies in Africa ... except one.

And that was because, as in Palestine, we'd introduced land-grabbing settlers, wasn't it?

So there was no fighting in South Africa or Kenya ? You want more facts more countries ?

South Africa achieved independence without any violence.

Meanwhile, you don't do facts otherwise you'd not be still defending Iron Sieve, 4 years after the whole project was shut down and the director frog-marched from his desk.

Night liar stick to a topic 

BM

I don´t see North Korea as a real threat. In theory craz Kim could launch a missile, but he is not that crazy, but between him and Trump, this is a bogus issue, both using their positions to bolster their base support at home -- just a distraction.

RGoss99 said:

In theory craz Kim could launch a missile, but he is not that crazy

Nothing crazy about it.

The US will attack North Korea and burn millions more to a crisp unless they can retaliate.

Not sure if I've asked you this before - when was the very last time the US attacked any nation that could retaliate?

Kim is slowly being bought to his knees without a bullet fired , there will be no war why fight when there is no need , he cannot fight the US he knows it , his Generals to a man know it and they also know that to retain power his only hope is via the negotiating table with the US

Every drought every hungry NK will bring him ever closer to finding a way out of his mire

BM