Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 883
    MEMBERS
  • 51909
    MESSAGES
  • 46
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Is it 2020 yet?   America - all of it

Started 11/19/18 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 33947 views.
katiek2

From: katiek2

11/21/19

Just hours before the debate began, US ambassador to the United Nations Gordon Sondland delivered damning testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, saying that US President Donald Trump expressly directed him to pursue a "quid quo pro" with Ukraine.

This is simply not true - I watched Sondland's entire testimony.  What he said, in fact, is that when he asked Trump "what do you want from Ukraine", Trump replied "I don't want anything - no quid quo pro, nothing  I just want Zelesky to do what he campaigned on". When Sondland was asked what Trump was referring to, he answered (paraphrasing here) that Trump wanted Zelesky to work on cleaning up Ukrainian corruption.  When Sondland was asked about whether conditions were attached to the release of aid to Ukraine, he replied that it was his presumption that it was, but that Trump never specifically directed it.  When asked if anyone had specifically directed it, if any one person in the entire world had directed him to pursue any conditions attached to the aid, Sondland repllied "No".
Di (amina046)

From: Di (amina046)

11/22/19

Opinion: Psychiatrists and Republican strategists are worried about Trump after this week

'He has terrible judgment, and if he had real lawyers they would've hit him with a cattle-prod before they let him do that interview'

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

11/23/19

You're skipping over the part where he said "Was there quid pro quo? Absolutely yes".

Donald made the phone call the day the Whistleblower's complaint dropped.

I'm sure it's just coincidence.

katiek2

From: katiek2

11/24/19

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

You're skipping over the part where he said "Was there quid pro quo? Absolutely yes".

He said that at the beginning of his testimony.  He later amended it to "my presumption was it was quid pro quo".  

Di (amina046)

From: Di (amina046)

11/24/19

He learned the fudging from his buddy with the beloved ass!

katiek2

From: katiek2

11/24/19

Di (amina046) said:

He learned the fudging from his buddy with the beloved ass!

Sorry, you lost me..

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

11/25/19

Sigh... another one...


In reply toRe: msg 163
Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

11/25/19

Opinion


katiek2

From: katiek2

11/25/19

Don't get me started - if I open my mouth, I wil vomit!

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

11/26/19

You're not the only one.


TOP