Coalition of the Confused
Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
- 970
MEMBERS - 55121
MESSAGES - 26
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
The debate on Climate Change General Confusion
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Aug-28
Totally agree on the nuclear power.
As I understood the article (which is significantly less than you), the idea floated is to cause a volcanic eruption in order to get a degree of global relief.
How would this be done?
From: slackerx
Aug-28
Jenifer (Zarknorph) said...
How would this be done?
"Yeah, but how do you start up a volcano?" (54:55-55:00)
- Edited August 28, 2020 12:31 pm by slackerx
From: RRBud
Aug-28
We don't have non-nuclear technology for triggering large volcanic eruptions yet, so for the next 50 years at least we can't do that. Probably just as well!
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Aug-29
Yeah, the phrase "What could possibly go wrong?" seems appropriate.
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Sep-15
Greenland glacier loses 110 square kilometres' worth of ice
A chunk of Greenland's ice cap, estimated to be 110 square kilometres, has broken off in the far north-east Arctic.
Read more from www.abc.net.auFrom: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Sep-20
PM refuses to commit to net zero carbon emissions by 2050
Ahead of the release of the Federal Government's long-awaited technology roadmap, Scott Morrison refuses to commit to a target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050, despite describing it as "achievable".
Read more from www.abc.net.auFrom: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Sep-22
High temperatures shrink Arctic Ocean ice cover to near-record levels
Ice in the Arctic Ocean melted to its second-lowest level on record this summer, triggered by global warming along with natural forces, say US scientists.
Read more from www.abc.net.au