Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
5074 messages in 124 discussions
Latest 10/17/21 by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Latest 9:35 AM by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest 4:12 AM by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Sep-25 by NISSY (NISSY2)
820 messages in 15 discussions
Latest Sep-22 by ElDotardo
Hague was neither 3rd or 9th richest - he was not rich at all , LORD Hagues current wealth is akin to some others who do the after dinner rounds write books etc HIS CURRENT wealth is after his political demise (which had nothing to do with Jews or ZIONISTS but the loss of an election)
Take Lord Archer sold over 300 million books went to nick and is a hugely rich man
Our esteemed nit wit is seriously oblivious to honesty
These are the thugs in control of Hebron and Westminster and your Forum.
When the Zionists were destroying Lebanon in 2006, the Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Dan Gillerman, declared:
To those countries who claim that we are using disproportionate force, I have only this to say: "You're damn right we are. Because if your cities were shelled the way ours were, if your citizens were terrorized the way ours are, you would use much more force than we are using." https://www.jewishpress.com/printArticle.cfm?contentid=18897
Yet when William Hague, then the British Shadow Foreign Secretary had the temerity to use the same word "disproportionate" for the same action in the same place, Lebanon:
... A leading Zionist [Lord Kalms, a major Tory donor] hit out at Hague and told The Spectator that his comments were "not merely unhelpful" but "downright dangerous."
This was enough to secure a solemn undertaking from Hague’s boss Cameron that the ‘d’ word would not be used again. Suspicions regarding Hague still lingered, however, and in 2008 he was grilled by arch-Zionist journalist Danny Finkelstein at the Conservative Friends of Israel annual bash. "Are you a Zionist?" he was asked.
A discomfited and apologetic Hague had to agree. Later that year when Israel launched Operation Cast Lead against Gaza, the ‘d’ word did not pass his lips. http://www.palestinechronicle.com/uk-turns-on-israel-government-and-media-to-blame/
Why does that matter? Well, recall that "Disproportionate force" is the legal term for war-crimes.
Israelis can admit to such crimes - then blackmail even our top politicans into silence over them.
Many other British politicians been sacked by this foreign funded lobby, which rules all three of our political parties. William Hague has abandoned politics, Ken Livingstone (Labour) and Jenny Tonge (Lib Dem) have been forced out of their parties.
The object of overwhelming force is to suppress your enemy as quickly as possible - war was never about tit for tat it was winner takes the cake the vanquish then sit and talk ethics and morals .
Israel does not control Hevron it controls an area of Hevron ONLY
HAGUE stepped down (was he pushed or did he fall in 2014) some 6 years after the event that nit wit is holding onto like a dog with a bone
All the peoples mentioned from Livingstone to Tonge have both been justly accused of Anti Semitism and were ultimately suspended and or resigned from their parties , Livingstone said " it is not anti-Semitic to hate the Jews of Israel " this is but one example and of course I don't expect an Anti Semite to understand that which offends Jews .
bml00 said: All the peoples mentioned from Livingstone to Tonge have both been justly accused of Anti Semitism and were ultimately suspended and or resigned from their parties
None of them tried to incite fear and hatred of the Jews the way you do all the time!
But thankyou for so graphically underlining what I said - I live under Occupied Washington.
Do you see me at anytime as an Anti Semite or somebody that would or could incite hatred of Jews?
An honest reply good or bad please
No hijacking please.
Since you seek to defend genocide and even individual Nazi apologists, I can't stop you.
Your snide comments do not change the fact you broke the rules.
All opinions are welcome here.
However - Hijacking is not tolerated. I don't care how passionate you feel about a topic; a thread devoted to pictures of adorable kittens is not the place to start an argument about the Holocaust.
You get three warnings, then you're gagged for a week.
This thread is (mostly? entirely?) about hate-crimes.
You have people in here piously saying they oppose such things when they very, very plainly defend even the world's nastiest hate crimes.
Like I said, if you want even the most fraudulent and unpleasant Nazi apologists in your Forum I can't stop you.