This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons, particularly in larger calibres (12.7+mm).
Latest 4:44 by EmericD
Latest 2-Dec by Farmplinker
Latest 2-Dec by DavidPawley
Latest 29-Nov by dobrodan
Latest 27-Nov by autogun
Latest 26-Nov by roguetechie
Latest 24-Nov by Red7272
Latest 23-Nov by Red7272
Latest 22-Nov by roguetechie
Latest 21-Nov by autogun
Latest 26-Sep by QuintusO
Latest 20-Nov by Farmplinker
Latest 19-Nov by taschoene
Latest 10-Nov by tomo_pauk
Latest 7-Nov by tidusyuki
Latest 6-Nov by tidusyuki
Latest 5-Nov by TonyDiG
How do you calculate frag range? just speed or do you add up another variables?
I may do it in a couple different ways, furthest distance to 1,700 ft/s or 1,900 ft/s or 2,100 ft/s depending on the kind of bullet, and usually with small caliber stuff like that, I'll limit it to furthest distance to 720 J. Looks like I didn't do that for that chart, though.
Not 100% happy with the math I used for this analysis, but I am losing interest so might as well post it:
BTW, if you want to execute this concept correctly, you need to start thinking in terms of duplex or triplex ammo, as that dramatically increases the bullet-in-magazine density.
And yes, I've explored this idea too:
Including some basic studies on firing mechanism.
The big challenge is the barrel, which must have either three bores in very close proximity, or the ability to rotate a cartridge to line up with the bore at very high RPMs.
This is my current favorite proposal: .224 Valkyrie with the COAL increased by forty thousandths of an inch, and the MAP increased to 5600 BAR, and loaded with the Mk3 VKO. The additional COAL enables finer bullets while making sure most of the time you can't chamber the overpressure rounds in regular chambers (which aren't in abundance anyway). Note that the 5600 BAR limit does not impart much of a kaboom risk, but it does impart a stress risk, i.e. bolts will break too soon if you fire a steady diet in a rifle not rated for that round. Difficult to do that if the magazines physically do not fit in the wrong rifles.
What's the point in keeping the original chamber spec? Good question. I have considered several times alternate specs that would prevent the rounds from being chambered at all in existing .224 Valkyrie chambers. I do not believe those solutions make sense. If you're going to do that, you might as well go neckless, which is another idea certainly. But this one has a pathway. I can start empirical work on it for $500 smackaroos. Most of the failure modes are graceful. Performance is great all around (it smashes all the GPC metrics).
I promised you the briefs on Hellcat and Archangel, but work was busy and I had a few days of passing out almost immediately after coming home. But I've finally remembered, so here they are.
A note. The Archangel brief was written before Archangel was designed. It was a pitch to a company that I will not name for me to design the gun. They declined, and I designed it anyway. Nobody ever said I was a great businessman, hahaha. But it gives you a great idea what my goals and thought processes were when designing that gun.
The Hellcat brief was written at the end of 2019 because a lot of people were asking me to bring them up to speed on my projects (Hellcat being then current). The brief includes a basic summary of Hellcat as well as the other guns I had designed to that point.
Archangel Rifle Proposal: https://mega.nz/file/r99gBIhQ#9uE1EAakgZ7O8GznYJ7srrDPPgMFAgOos8_ysIMRy84
Project Hellcat Brief: https://mega.nz/file/CstAWI7A#387un4wX6KXcvn7q9aMY8GYE4joxck0QOE-Mu4k5wL4
Thank you, Nathaniel. Would it be also possible to check the renders you posted time ago about archangel and hellcat?
Check them? Not sure I understand.
View the screenshots in detail? Knock yourself out.