Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 11:13 by Refleks
Latest 7:19 by schnuersi
Latest 27-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 27-Jan by stancrist
Latest 27-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 27-Jan by graylion
Latest 27-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 26-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 26-Jan by graylion
Latest 26-Jan by graylion
Latest 26-Jan by autogun
Latest 26-Jan by smg762
Latest 25-Jan by schnuersi
Latest 24-Jan by ZailC
Latest 24-Jan by stancrist
Latest 24-Jan by renatohm
Latest 23-Jan by Apsyda
Latest 23-Jan by BruhMomento
Latest 22-Jan by schnuersi
Latest 21-Jan by graylion
Latest 21-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 20-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20/5/22 by ramosausust
Latest 18-Jan by nincomp
Latest 17-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 15-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 14-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 14-Jan by Refleks
Latest 13-Jan by EmericD
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 11-Jan by RovingPedant
Latest 8-Jan by wiggy556
Latest 7-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by autogun
Latest 5-Jan by autogun
Latest 3-Jan by stancrist
Latest 3-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 30-Dec by Refleks
27/7/15
autogun said...
stancrist said...
autogun said...
...bearing in mind that MGs are always likely to have longer barrels than IWs...Two words that should never be used -- "never" and "always" ;^)
Basic English comprehension: "always likely to have" does not mean the same as "always have" - it's describing a probability.
Yup. But is "always likely to have" even an accurate statement?
M1 rifle, 24" bbl; M1919 machine gun, 24" bbl
M14 rifle, 22" bbl; M60 machine gun, 22" bbl
M16 rifle, 20" bbl; M249 machine gun, 18" barrel
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M249 machine gun, 14.5" bbl
27/7/15
Thanks for the detailed answer.
In short: life is compromise, and one has to make the optimal choices based on one's needs.
And as Stan points out, mag lenght is important in ergonomics, especially for warfighters with smaller hands, and for storing, for all warfighters.
Being a little pickier: do you have any idea how much volume is lost when using poly cases?
27/7/15
What I would find interesting is a 7.62 round based on the existing case for a longer ogive projectile. Either by dropping the length of the case to about 45/47 mm and perhaps using a rebated rim case like the .284 winchester. Your .224 scaled up to 7.62 is looking around .27 and 9.8ish grams. An MV of 840 mps should be practical with the larger case at least.
27/7/15
stancrist said...
M1 rifle, 24" bbl; M1919 machine gun, 24" bbl
M14 rifle, 22" bbl; M60 machine gun, 22" bbl
M16 rifle, 20" bbl; M249 machine gun, 18" barrel
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M249 machine gun, 14.5" bbl
Others you left out:
M16 rifle, 20" bbl; M60 machine gun, 22" bbl
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M240 machine gun, 24.5" bbl
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M249 machine gun, 18" bbl
27/7/15
H_Minus said...
stancrist said...
M1 rifle, 24" bbl; M1919 machine gun, 24" bbl
M14 rifle, 22" bbl; M60 machine gun, 22" bbl
M16 rifle, 20" bbl; M249 machine gun, 18" barrel
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M249 machine gun, 14.5" bbl
Others you left out:
M16 rifle, 20" bbl; M60 machine gun, 22" bbl
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M240 machine gun, 24.5" bbl
Omitted because they're apples vs watermelons nonsense. Need to compare weapons in the same caliber. Otherwise, you could take such silliness to extreme, and compare 5.56mm M4 to .50 M2.
H_Minus said...
M4 carbine, 14.5" bbl; M249 machine gun, 18" bbl
I doubt those units which are "pure fleeted" with M4 carbines use 18" barrel M249s. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing.