This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 15:34 by roguetechie
Latest 10:47 by schnuersi
Latest 18-May by RovingPedant
Latest 18-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 18-May by TarheelYank
Latest 16-May by graylion
Latest 14-May by Farmplinker
Latest 14-May by autogun
Latest 13-May by Petrus_Optim
Latest 13-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 12-May by graylion
Latest 12-May by gatnerd
Latest 9-May by DavidPawley
Latest 9-May by taschoene
Latest 9-May by gatnerd
Latest 29-Apr by mpopenker
Latest 28-Apr by taschoene
Latest 28-Apr by autogun
Latest 24-Apr by taschoene
Latest 24-Apr by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 22-Apr by stancrist
Latest 22-Apr by gatnerd
Latest 20-Apr by roguetechie
Going back to the FCS on 6.8, i was surprised that all the guns have a recoiling barrel... if one wanted 700m precision shots, is this going to be a handicap...
surely its better to have a sensor on the barrel and a smart optic that reads the sensor
Actually, barrel life is well in hand.
As far as the recoiling barrel thing, the answer is no.
Does somebody know what is the source of this photo of a mockup that Drummond posted 4 years ago?
he also posted this...i dunno what the round on the far right is
I remember someone here claimed more info, basically the case was loaded with Rocket fuel and ran at 80-100k psi. Some of these proposals we are seeing... I wanted it scaled to 6mm or .257, but I am odd.
I would really like to know how thoroughly that round was tested. Was it fired only in test barrels, or were any machine guns and assault rifles converted?
I'm very skeptical that such a long, thin, un-tapered case would chamber and extract reliably in automatic weapons, especially after propellant residue has accumulated in the chamber.
I suspect it was tested just enough to get velocity readings... a slight taper should not have been impossible. perhaps with the new case designs we are seeing it could be revisited, though the comment I referred to earlier indicated the Propellant would have been hugely expensive.
For all the new case designs, I still think the one DTIC talked about years ago was very promising. It was an Aluminum head, thin stainless steel body.
It saved so much weight in the case that it was stated the loaded weight of the round was reduced enough to allow an extra round for IIRC every 5 rounds.
so 20% Cartridge savings.
With some of the high strength aluminum alloys, I wonder what pressures it could have handled, for the topic of this thread.
found some more recent information on the design. \ I forgot how much I liked NDIA
This particular presentation was about a .338 Norma case for the LW MMG concept. it is a little different from the previous one I had seen that was for 7.62x51mm.
now the aluminum head is on the outside, rather than being inside the stainless steel body. am I converting correctly, is 500 Mpa = 72518.9 PSI?
Im more interested in the claim of a 75percent heat reduction....what kind of wizardry were they applying to the propellants to achieve this