gatnerd

Military Guns and Ammunition

Hosted by gatnerd

This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.

  • 3271
    MEMBERS
  • 185570
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

NGSW Phase 2 Consolidation and info   Small Arms <20mm

Started 30/8/19 by gatnerd; 279488 views.
EwingGreg

From: EwingGreg

1-Oct

I suspect it was tested just enough to get velocity readings...             a slight taper should not have been impossible.   perhaps with the new case designs we are seeing it could be revisited, though the comment I referred to earlier indicated the Propellant would have been hugely expensive. 

For all the new case designs, I still think the one DTIC talked about years ago was very promising.   It was an Aluminum head, thin stainless steel body.  

It saved so much weight in the case that it was stated the loaded weight of the round was reduced enough to allow an extra round for IIRC every 5 rounds.   

so 20% Cartridge savings.   

With some of the high strength aluminum alloys, I wonder what pressures it could have handled, for the topic of this thread.  

EwingGreg

From: EwingGreg

1-Oct

found some more recent information on the design.   \ I forgot how much I liked NDIA

This particular presentation was about a .338 Norma case for the LW MMG concept.   it is a little different from the previous one I had seen that was for 7.62x51mm.

now the aluminum head is on the outside, rather than being inside the stainless steel body.       am I converting correctly, is 500 Mpa  =  72518.9  PSI?

smg762

From: smg762

2-Oct

Im more interested in the claim of a 75percent heat reduction....what kind of wizardry were they applying to the propellants to achieve this

ZailC

From: ZailC

2-Oct

What were the particulars of that 75% heat reduction?

smg762

From: smg762

3-Oct

They said it was all down to the propellant...didnt talk about it much.

Strikes me as a good method to lower barrel wear with rounds like the 300win mag

JPeelen

From: JPeelen

3-Oct

Numerically, your MPa to PSI conversion is correct.

But keep in mind that there a several methods of measuring  pressures in use (CIP, SAAMI, EPVAT, you name it; not to mention copper crusher versus piezo)  which can yield very different results for thes ame cartridge. Any numeric conversion gives you only a ballpark value.    

poliorcetes

From: poliorcetes

4-Oct

I just have published an article about textron CT cartridge at defensa.com

https://www.defensa.com/industria/revolucionaria-municion-vaina-telescopica

I would really appreciate any comments and above all criticisms

renatohm

From: renatohm

4-Oct

I liked it, but the ammo pics are deformed.

EwingGreg

From: EwingGreg

4-Oct

It is annoying that there are different ways to measure internal pressure.  SAAMI and CIP use different methods, and there are probably other ones used too. 

poliorcetes

From: poliorcetes

5-Oct

yeah, reading it using a smartphone it's what happens. Tomorrow is going to be published the second part

TOP