Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 15:37 by Harrison Beene (harrisonbeen)
Latest 6:40 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 3:32 by mpopenker
Latest 21-Mar by ZailC
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 21-Mar by stancrist
Latest 20-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 19-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 18-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15-Mar by JPeelen
Latest 13-Mar by taschoene
Latest 13-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 13-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 13-Mar by Jeff (Jefffar)
Latest 13-Mar by Refleks
Latest 12-Mar by graylion
Latest 11-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 9-Mar by graylion
Latest 7-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 6-Mar by stancrist
Latest 6-Mar by graylion
Latest 6-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 5-Mar by gatnerd
Latest 5-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 1-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 26-Feb by graylion
19/11/21
No sig has not won the mg338 contract at all...
And shit like this is why many of us dislike sig strongly because of their deceptive ass marketing department.
19/11/21
Gr1ff1th said:the contract also leaves open the possibility of the adoption of the TV Rifle, and then later adopting the future Lonestar LWMMG
That seems unlikely. One intent of NGSW is a common caliber for squad weapons.
Having a mix of 6.8mm rifles and .338 machine guns would be contrary to that goal.
And it's one thing to carry a .338 MG with a 20-round starter belt for a promo video.
Lightweight Medium Machine Gun (LWMMG) - .338NM Cartridge. - YouTube
But, is a .338 machine gun truly practical for automatic riflemen in actual combat?
19/11/21
By LWMMG I mean the Lonestar 6.8 MMG (seeing as it's a rifle caliber basically, and I added LW for lightweight)), that was my bad
And no I don't think .338 MG's are practical at the squad level, even with CT/TV Ammo
19/11/21
Gr1ff1th said:By LWMMG I mean the Lonestar 6.8 MMG (seeing as it's a rifle caliber basically, and I added LW for lightweight)), that was my bad
Yeah, when you said Lonestar LWMMG, I thought you were talking about this:
"In addition to access to the NGSW firearm intellectual property, LoneStar is also moving forward with the GD-OTS Lightweight Medium Machine Gun design in 338 Norma Mag..."
I googled, but didn't find anything about a Lonestar 6.8mm MMG. Did I miss that part of the discussion?
19/11/21
Again, this also looks to be an error from me, In the original press release discussed here they mentioned that Lonestar was working on lightweight medium machine gun, which I took to mean a 6.8 MMG, I didn't know they were going to continue development of the GD-LWMMG in .338, which now I know.
As a side note, does anyone know how much pull a .338 MG actually has in the US Military, it seems like a solution looking for a problem, although maybe high pressure TV .338 will change that somewhat.
19/11/21
Gr1ff1th said:a .338 MG...seems like a solution looking for a problem
Totally agree.