Emeric, have you had the opportunity to section a True Velocity case?  If so, was some type of reinforcing added to the shoulder and neck area.

Thanks

nincomp said:

I don't know if a polymer case body with a solid shoulder area would be injection molded in one piece.   I've looked at pictures of TV's 308 ammo and even viewed TV's videos in slow motion, but I cannot see into a fired case.  To be honest, if no pics show up soon, I am tempted to buy a some, just so I can section it.   For what it is worth, the 6.8 TVC ammo case is made in two pieces, with the neck welded onto the body. 

TV patent drawing shows the same two-piece construction for their necked cases:  https://forum.cartridgecollectors.org/t/true-velocity-metal-injection-molded-ammunition-cartridge-case-head-patent-the-all-inclusive-composite-cartridge-case-or-so-they-say/43084

TV advertisement shows thickened shoulder similar to what I think you proposed:  https://forum.cartridgecollectors.org/t/true-velocity-polymer-case-ammunition/27365/5

Note the claim of more efficient powder burn.  This is one reason why I think it's necessary to compare necked polymer case 6.8x51 ammo to neckless 6.8x51 TVCM in order to determine what effect the neckless configuration has on muzzle velocity.

nincomp said:

Emeric, have you had the opportunity to section a True Velocity case?  If so, was some type of reinforcing added to the shoulder and neck area.

Unfortunately, no, and the people from TV took large efforts to be sure that no empty cases remained on the ground (or into pockets) after firing.

nincomp said:

It would resemble the 6.8 TVC case with a hollow tube attached to the front. 

Instead of a tube that could produce feeding problems, make something like 3 or 4 petals following the bullet ogive, that could open to let the bullet pass.

nincomp said:

To be honest, if no pics show up soon, I am tempted to buy a some, just so I can section it.   For what it is worth, the 6.8 TVC ammo case is made in two pieces, with the neck welded onto the body.

Well, it looks like you can save your hardly-earned  money.  I just found a photo showing the two-piece construction.

EmericD said:

       stancrist said: If polymer cases need a greater thickness of material at the neck, how do you explain https://youtu.be/G1DCJsMKJb0?t=30 ?

The magic of the Internet. Now, take the 100,000 or about M240 in service in the US Army and try to duplicate the video, I'm pretty sure that the result will be much different.

Okay, if True Velocity is concealing a flaw in this product...

...perhaps there is also a significant flaw in this product?

stancrist said:

Okay, if True Velocity is concealing a flaw in this product...

I won't call that "a flaw".

The GAU-8 is using aluminium cases to save a lot of weight, even if everybody (including the designers) knows that in case of a burn thru, you are going to lose the gun.

Lead-free primers are less reliable than leaded primers, but people want to use them because you reduce lead emissions.

So, even if a composite case split a neck every one in a thousand rounds, there's a lot of scenarios where you could use them.

EmericD said:

I won't call that "a flaw".

The GAU-8 is using aluminium cases to save a lot of weight, even if everybody (including the designers) knows that in case of a burn thru, you are going to lose the gun.

How many GAU-8 guns have been lost to burn thru of the aluminum case?

EmericD said:

So, even if a composite case split a neck every one in a thousand rounds, there's a lot of scenarios where you could use them.

If the neck separates from a cartridge case every one in a thousand rounds, I think most soldiers would consider that a rather serious flaw.  I sure would.

And if the USAF lost a GAU-8 to case burn thru every 1000 rounds, it's a safe bet they'd consider it such a serious flaw they wouldn't use aluminum cases.

Thanks for finding those photos of the TV case.  I recall hearing a TV rep mentioning that they could optimize the powder column but was unsure if they had done so on their "normal" ammo.

EmericD said:

Instead of a tube that could produce feeding problems, make something like 3 or 4 petals following the bullet ogive, that could open to let the bullet pass.

It would be interesting if they could do something like that and allow the ogive to be recessed in that false "neck" section.   I had been thinking about that too.  It would allow existing cartridges like 5.56x45 or 7.62.51 to use bullets with longer ogives.  The trick would be to assure that the bullet stays supported and aligned with the bore and that the petals stay attached to the case.