Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 12-Aug by SiverSurfeR
Latest 12-Aug by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 11-Aug by JPeelen
Latest 10-Aug by autogun
Latest 10-Aug by schnuersi
Latest 5-Aug by mpopenker
Latest 3-Aug by nincomp
Latest 3-Aug by dudutin
Latest 1-Aug by stancrist
Latest 31-Jul by gatnerd
Latest 27-Jul by Guardsman26
Latest 26-Jul by Refleks
4-Jul
Ukraine's Plastic Machine Gun Belts -The Firearm Blog
Looks very useful for 7.62x54R, but it is a different link design than used with 7.62x51 and 6.8x51.
4-Jul
Pull-out rather than push-through does make more sense for plastic link. I’ve seen plastic M13 link but apparently it’s not as robust as the metal. Not really a surprise.
18-Jul
Thanks to Established Titles for sponsoring this video! Get 10% off on any purchase with code GARANDTHUMB. Go to https://establishedtitles.com/GARANDTHUMB an...
27-Jul
If your M14 flashbacks werent already in effect, I present: SIG working to develop a stamped steel magazine for the NGSW.
https://soldiersystems.net/2022/07/25/sig-sauer-develops-in-house-magazine-production-capability/
In the comments, Eric of SSD mentions that the 6.8 projectiles are being harsh on the Lancer mags, which may be a reason for this. Although how they would be worse than M855A1, or how relatively soft steel would be much better against Hardened steel / Tunsgten, is an open question.
A loaded M14 mag was 1.5-1.62lbs depending on source...
27-Jul
gatnerd said:In the comments, Eric of SSD mentions that the 6.8 projectiles are being harsh on the Lancer mags, which may be a reason for this. Although how they would be worse than M855A1, or how relatively soft steel would be much better against Hardened steel / Tunsgten, is an open question.
Other possible reasons for SIG developing in-house magazine production:
- Eliminate reliance on Lancer.
- Increase SIG profits.
28-Jul
Oh, those are absolute factors to bring manufacturing in-house, and are totally legit.
But, whats very odd here is the choice of steel for the in-house 6.8 mags.
-Polymer mags are much easier to mass manufacture and are cheaper to produce compared to steel mags (so higher profit margin for SIG)
-Polymer is much lighter and is what most modern rifle mags are made of
-Magpul Gen 3 mags have already shown a 100% polymer mag works well with EPR when designed for it
28-Jul
Maybe things doesn't scale up / down so easily.
Maybe a polymer mag that is OK with a 12 g cartridge and an impulse of 6 N.s, will struggle to maintain the same level of performance with a round nearly twice as heavy and the increased impulse & recoil velocity?
The M80A1 is mainly used in guns that don't have polymer mags.
28-Jul
EmericD said:The M80A1 is mainly used in guns that don't have polymer mags
The Armys new squad DMR CSASS uses a polymer mag; I havent heard that it will use special match ammo so I assume it would use M80A1?
28-Jul
gatnerd said:The Armys new squad DMR CSASS uses a polymer mag; I havent heard that it will use special match ammo so I assume it would use M80A1?
Or maybe M118LR?