Very surprising development.

Steyr is showing a 7lb rifle capable of firing both 7.62 and 6.8x51:

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2023/03/01/enforcetac-2023-steyr-dmr/

The goal of the new Steyr DMR was to reach a combination of accuracy and lightweight design. To this end, Steyr’s new DMR is said to be a sub-MOA rifle that is capable of shooting .277 FURY/6.8x51mm, .308 Winchester, and 6.5 Creedmoor. The piston-driven system also features a reversible charging handle making the Steyr DMR much easier to adopt for both left and right-handed shooters. Steyr DMR doesn’t require a buffer tube to operate and therefore it features a folding stock, that is compatible with any off-the-shelf AR stock. The rifle can also be fired with the stock folded according to Steyr.

The rifle features four different gas settings for regular conditions, adverse conditions, gas-off, and then a silencer setting that is also meant to be used with subsonic ammunition. The rifle also features a “quick change barrel system” that requires only a torque wrench to swap out. Steyr has said that although it’s called a quick change barrel system, it really meant to simplify the process for armorers rather than to serve as an in-the-field barrel change system. Lastly, the rifle will make use of regular AR-10/SR-25 pattern magazines.

The Steyr DMR has been in development for about two years and the plan is to have the rifle start going into production by the end of 2023 in Europe, Steyr has said that they are even ready to take orders for the rifle right now. 

YouTube

NEW Light and Accurate Steyr DMR Piston AR-10

In this episode of TFBTV Show Time, @JamesReeves is at EnforceTac in Germany to speak with @Steyrmannlicher-rifles about the new Steyr DMR. The Steyr DMR is...

''Ar15 master race'' folks must at one point consider its not AR15 or Ar10 when there is practicaly nothing left of the original features.

"Stoner-inspired" is what we'll call it.....

Kind of like the DI "Kalashnikov".

I take solace in knowing somewhere in hell Melvin Johnson is pissed off every time someone says this lol.

Melvin Johnson: Am I a joke to you people?

Yeah Melvin kinda hah.

Oh well at least Melvin can be consoled slightly by seeing good old jean bristle at mostly being "known for" a design he spent the rest of his career trying to knock off it's pillar...

There's a lesson in this somewhere I'm sure but I'll be damned if I can come up with what it is. For anyone who thinks gene didn't at least somewhat hate what the AR became take a look at the FARC, it's about as far from what we think of as the AR as you can get while still being a gun 

https://youtu.be/XPOoncsRICA

Any news on that? I mean is just the rifle program canceled or the LMG (XM250) too? 

AFAIK, the XM7 has not been canceled.  That video is based on an Army Times opinion piece (The not-really Next Generation Weapons Program) in which the author thinks that the NGSW program should be canceled.  This bozo took the author's opinion as fact.

And that author seems to have no experience with infantry small arms beyond watching a bunch of YouTube videos.  I mean, I enjoy InRange TV most of the time, but their "mud test" is not a serious controlled trial under realistic conditions.  And I don't think anyone has been doing YouTube tests with representative AP ammo at actual XM7 pressures.  Which isn't to say that the XM7 can actually deliver -- I have no idea.  But civilian YouTube videos are not a credible test of that.

I still have 2 of my own 6mm cake(TAC6) rifles based on a 6.8 case and built on the LWRC SIX8 platform.  18" barrels, 90 ScenarL-95SMK bullets at 2800fps. For all practical purposes it is a 30 Herrett necked down to 6mm using 6.8 cases trimmed back to 1.59" but loaded to 2.3". Mag cap is 30 rnds.

At 100yds  energy is 50% more than SS109 and at 200-300YDs the energy is double, the 308 shooting 155gr Lapuas would only have 50% more energy than the TAC6.

Recoil doesn't seem to be much more than a 5.56, less than a 6.8 and much less than a 308. Timed through the shooting house I am much faster than any 308 I have tried, HKG3, M1A, AR10 and the lightweight DPMS G2 with a mid gas 16" barrel on it.

I know for myself the weight of the rifle and ammo combined along with heavier recoil slows me down...a lot, I would rather carry one of the 6mms than the 308s.

Harrison Beene (harrisonbeen) said:

I still have 2 of my own 6mm cake(TAC6) rifles based on a 6.8 case and built on the LWRC SIX8 platform.  18" barrels, 90 ScenarL-95SMK bullets at 2800fps.

We recently tried a LMT rifle chambered for the 6 mm ARC, and measured only ~780 m/s (2560 fps) with the 105 gr BTHP from a 18" barrel (2070 J at the muzzle vs. 2120 for your 6 mm SPC).

It seems that the AR-15 bolt diameter is a real limiting factor, and increasing the case diameter should be followed by reducing the cartridge MAP, so no real benefits at the end of the day.

Here, we are still testing the technical "bricks" to make a neckless 5.56 mm NATO.

We tested a 64 gr solid bullet with a C7 BC of 0.208, but the accuracy wasn't really good due to the large initial yaw of the design. We changed the boat-tail shape, the C7 BC dropped to 0.201 but the accuracy issues were solved. We were able to launch this bullet at 945 m/s from a 18" Mk12 rifle. The case was a regular 5.56x45 mm, but trimmed to 40.5 - 40.7 mm.

This bullet was lathe-turned but we started to study cold-forming, when the need for "increased penetration against ceramic armor" emerged, and derailed this effort.

So, now we are going to scale-up this bullet to .264", with a long steel core, and load this bullet in a high capacity .260 Remington steel case. The case capacity is ~20% higher than brass case (3.6 cm^3 excluding the neck and half the shoulder), weight is only 7.1 g, and we should be able to reach >970 m/s from a 18" barrel and with a bullet in the 95 - 100 gr class (for a cartridge mass around 17.0 - 17.4 g).

Seems Australia is developing its own 6.8x51 that does not use a 2 part case like SIG:

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cn26BxHvYDH/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y%3D