Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 8-Dec by graylion
Latest 8-Dec by stancrist
Latest 8-Dec by stancrist
Latest 8-Dec by gatnerd
Latest 8-Dec by gatnerd
Latest 7-Dec by gatnerd
Latest 7-Dec by gatnerd
Latest 7-Dec by farmplinker2
Latest 2-Dec by schnuersi
Latest 1-Dec by EmericD
Latest 1-Dec by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 29-Nov by stancrist
Latest 27-Nov by renatohm
Latest 25-Nov by stancrist
Latest 24-Nov by farmplinker2
Latest 23-Nov by schnuersi
Latest 23-Nov by autogun
Latest 23-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 22-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 22-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 17-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 16-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by schnuersi
Latest 11-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
17-Aug
stancrist said:Here is an older SIG XM250 data sheet (for the 6.8x51mm version) that does list weapon weight:
I don't know if it's an official document by SIG-Sauer (the German flag looks highly suspicious), as this flyer bears the tag "by Ricardo Torres", and the 4395 J of muzzle energy listed don't fit well with a 135 gr bullet launched at 950 m/s (but 4395 J is OK with a 150 gr bullet launched at 951 m/s, which is exactly what SIG is claiming for the Elite Bonded bullet from a 24" barrel).
20-Aug
Many would see this as a "future" rifle setup. Truth is, it is a "now" rifle setup, as enemies both foreign and domestic have individual capabilities much gr...
.
20-Aug
Interesting setup, but they really need to use a different suppressor in order to reduce fouling!
See how heavily lubricated the bolt carrier is before they start shooting, and all the carbon deposit on the gun frame and on the cartridges?
20-Aug
I did not notice how heavily lubed was the bolt carrier, but it was impossible to miss the carbon deposit on the cartridges.
22-Aug
how come the energy is listed as 3200 ft lbs. This is way beyond the 2700 listed for 6.8, and surely its massively overbore too.
in terms of a 7mm magnum for machine guns, could you some how make it work without barrel wear issues?
23-Aug
Another interesting thing is the additional lens in front of the main scope.
I know that FN Herstal is working on a similar but more complex device, with a Bluetooth connection to a FN Elity ballistic computer, so the lens is working like a "HUD", showing all the information from the Elity, including real-time reticle corrections depending on the range / atmosphere / wind.
This way, you can transform any existing scope into a XM157...
25-Aug
So almost like an aimbot. When the generell issue rifle of the troops get some sort of this optic. Let's say m5/M7 Is happening with that kinda optic..... There isn't a need for a DMR anymore or am I wrong?
25-Aug
manimal87 said:So almost like an aimbot. When the generell issue rifle of the troops get some sort of this optic. Let's say m5/M7 Is happening with that kinda optic..... There isn't a need for a DMR anymore or am I wrong?
For me, a "fully dressed" M7 (with scope & suppressor) is already a DMR, just because of the >6.5 kg weight and reduced ammo capability.