gatnerd

Military Guns and Ammunition

Hosted by gatnerd

This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.

  • 3433
    MEMBERS
  • 198181
    MESSAGES
  • 8
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

NGSW Phase 2 Consolidation and info   Small Arms <20mm

Started 30/8/19 by gatnerd; 745986 views.
autogun

From: autogun

30-Sep

stancrist said:

Has either army expressed concern about the training requirement?

I don't know - I've never asked. 

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

30-Sep

Relevant take on NGSW

A Critical Analysis: The Sig XM5 (M7)in 6.8, the Army got it Wrong.

The Sig XM5, (M7) points of concern with the rifle, and why I think it will not work as a general issue fighting rifle. My predictions with regards to its ro...

graylion

From: graylion

3-Oct

Mr. T (MrT4) said:

Relevant take on NGSW

I get his point - especially how an infantryman's rifle is in a way just his PDW. See also my post about snipers https://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/messages/8204/1. But also the above points about calibre mix are relevant. So the better coice might well be 6.5 CM across the board. Or something even milder, like a hotted up 6.5 Grendel with hybrid case and ignoring the AR15 length restriction.

EmericD

From: EmericD

3-Oct

graylion said:

Or something even milder, like a hotted up 6.5 Grendel with hybrid case and ignoring the AR15 length restriction.

That's exactly the definition of the 264 LICC.

graylion

From: graylion

3-Oct

EmericD said:

That's exactly the definition of the 264 LICC.

I'd forgotten about that. Do we have any more of an idea about that cartridge now?

stancrist

From: stancrist

3-Oct

graylion said:

       Mr. T (MrT4) said: Relevant take on NGSW

I get his point - especially how an infantryman's rifle is in a way just his PDW.

I disagree with that point.  While an assault rifle can be employed as a PDW, an assault rifle is not a PDW.

The assault rifle is designed to be used as an offensive weapon.

Russian Marines Storm Ukrainian Army Trenches in Novodonetsk | Daring Attack Caught On Cam

The Russian Ministry of Defence released video of Pacific Fleet Marine Corps assault forces thwarting an attack by Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF). According to...

Moment Chechen soldiers ambush Russian truck with machine guns

THIS is the moment Chechen soldiers ambush Russian truck with machine guns, killing the vehicles passengers. This footage was released by the Ukrainian Minis...

I was not impressed by the video, which has surprising errors and omissions.

In addition to the "assault rifle is a PDW nonsense, he mistakenly thinks NGSW was developed for the long ranges of the last war (i.e., Afghanistan), when NGSW actually was created for an anticipated future conflict with opponents equipped with modern body armor.  Since he failed to even mention the body armor issue, he appears to be completely unaware of that design purpose.

And his suggestion for a caliber mix at the squad level shows that he does not understand the Army wants only one caliber for squad weapons.

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

3-Oct

While it might not be the PDW  , he explained quite well why there is not lack of overmatch . i think he omitted body armor as its not the panacea folks think it is.

NGSW is like many other projects is developed with a lot of nearly irrelevant experience of GWOT, even if its supposedly aimed at future peer conflict. Long range / overmatch is definitely one of the  goals otherwise the optic/FCS requirement would be much different

In Ukraine, rifle use is at very short distances and body armor while adding protection is not an insurmountable obstacle that would warrant a full-power battle rifle in 6.8 that you would carry around all day and have much reduced ammo capacity for it. 

Full auto use also seems quite popular. Of course in ambushes behind enemy lines , suppressors are also used in Ukraine on a level not seen in wars prior.

ssstwitter.com_1694098229211

Watch "ssstwitter.com_1694098229211" on Streamable.

EmericD

From: EmericD

3-Oct

Mr. T (MrT4) said:

Full auto use also seems quite popular. Of course in ambushes behind enemy lines , suppressors are also used in Ukraine on a level not seen in wars prior.

The number of actions constituting war crimes is impressive in that video!

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

3-Oct

Are you seriously saying and ambush in Afghanistan by the Western forces would turned different, and troops rushed in with first aid after shooting everyone up, deep in the enemy's rear?

graylion

From: graylion

3-Oct

Mr. T (MrT4) said:

Are you seriously saying and ambush in Afghanistan by the Western forces would turned different, and troops rushed in with first aid after shooting everyone up, deep in the enemy's rear?

no, he is saying that not doing so is a war crime. 

TOP