Hosted by autogun
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 9:16 by larrikin2
Latest 28-Feb by stancrist
Latest 28-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 28-Feb by poliorcetes
Latest 27-Feb by larrikin2
Latest 27-Feb by Refleks
Latest 26-Feb by poliorcetes
Latest 26-Feb by autogun
Latest 25-Feb by autogun
Latest 24-Feb by autogun
Latest 22-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 21-Feb by autogun
Latest 20-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 19-Feb by autogun
Latest 18-Feb by autogun
Latest 17-Feb by Red7272
Latest 16-Feb by Refleks
Latest 16-Feb by Greybeard (Greybeard8)
Latest 15-Feb by stancrist
Latest 14-Feb by Farmplinker
Latest 14-Feb by tidusyuki
Latest 12-Feb by autogun
Latest 12-Feb by autogun
Latest 12-Feb by autogun
Latest 11-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 11-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 11-Feb by mpopenker
Latest 10-Feb by tidusyuki
Latest 9-Feb by nincomp
Latest 7-Feb by graylion
Latest 6-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 5-Feb by JPeelen
11-Feb
It is good that the author also lists muzzle energy, not just velocity.
The Hornady load yields 1176 J in the test, compared to 1107 J of the Speer Gold Dot. That is 6 percent more. On the other hand, it is still about 30 percent less than an ordinary load from a 20" barrel delivers.
The author observed reduced flash of the Hornady load, but interestingly does not mention the claimed reduced muzzle report.
11-Feb
Muzzle report is extremely subjective even if you're set up to measure decibel levels since tiny changes in placement positioning and etc can easily swamp the improvements an ammunition load could possibly give pretty easily
11-Feb
Isn't the difference between muzzle and ear measurements usually 10 decibels or so?
11-Feb
I do not know...
The one thing I know about this particular subject is that suppressor makers and etc have long since figured out how to game "the measurements" to a point where nato is developing a hard spec for how to do the testing because it's quite possible to game things heavily enough to make things look good that aren't.
I highly suspect that this quiet ammunition claim would be very subject to getting lost in the statistical noise.
It's sorta like how If you're doing precision shooting at 1km or less you don't calculate in coriolis because the amount of deviation it will induce in POI is smaller than the potential errors from other things by so much that it's effect is swallowed up in the noise from other factors.