Hosted by autogun
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 17:10 by EmericD
Latest 16:02 by Farmplinker
Latest 13:49 by roguetechie
Latest 2:27 by Martin2515
Latest 1:46 by Martin2515
Latest 0:58 by Martin2515
Latest 16-Apr by hobbes154
Latest 14-Apr by renatohm
Latest 14-Apr by roguetechie
Latest 12-Apr by RovingPedant
Latest 8-Apr by Farmplinker
Latest 8-Apr by tidusyuki
Latest 3-Apr by roguetechie
Latest 3-Apr by gatnerd
Latest 31-Mar by larrikin2
Latest 28-Mar by DavidPawley
Latest 27-Mar by stancrist
Latest 26-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 24-Mar by Mustrakrakis
Latest 24-Mar by poliorcetes
Latest 19-Mar by Refleks
Latest 18-Mar by Red7272
25-Mar
It seems punching through body armor at 600+ M might be one of the drivers of this caliber that is meant as a service round compatible with ,338LM rifles , just changing the barrel
https://www.edrmagazine.eu/ruag-ammotec-375-swiss-p-improved-performance-made-easy
Interesting bullet on the picts ,seems like oldfashioned FMJ with metal ball to stop the lead flow into the tip
25-Mar
Thats cool.
Curious how they are able to achieve superior ballistics given that they haven't increased the bullets Ogive length.
Claim of defeating SK4 (german level IV?) at 600m is impressive, given the Chinese Level IV plate was stopping 250gr AP at 200yd.
25-Mar
gatnerd said:Curious how they are able to achieve superior ballistics given that they haven't increased the bullets Ogive length.
The cartridge is using a sligthly bigger case diameter than the .338 Lapua, with a rebated head to use the same bolt.
Most comparison between the .375 Swiss P and the .338 Lapua Magnum are made using a 250 gr bullet (C7 of 0.315 for the Swiss P target) launched at 865 m/s for the .338, versus a 350 gr bullet (C7 of 0.375 for the SMK) launched at 865 m/s for the .375, hence the conclusion (more energy on target).
25-Mar
Thank you for the clarification.
Do you think its a worthwhile cartridge, especially compared to the 300gr Lapua/Norma loadings?
25-Mar
Like you mentioned i think its about making a good AP round that can fit into standard .338LM actions and magazines. The long-range performance is a bit sketchy,as they are comparing relatively mediocre .338LM bullet out of a shorter barrel than what they use for theirs.375 It will also be difficult to load any longer bullets
25-Mar
I'm curious how it stacks up AP wise to the 300gr .338 tungsten loads.
Awhile back Emeric had mentioned that its not just the mass, but really the length of the penetrator, that really contributes to the penetration. Since they haven't increased the ogive length, I imagine their ~350gr Tungsten penetrator is the same length as the 300gr Tungsten.
26-Mar
Will see what gives once these get into the wild. they made CIP 5years ago so i would think they had time to think this over.