Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 10:00 by mpopenker
Latest 7:03 by schnuersi
Latest 5:30 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 4:26 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 2:33 by farmplinker2
Latest 23-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 22-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 22-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 21-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 19-Sep by stancrist
Latest 19-Sep by stancrist
Latest 19-Sep by smg762
Latest 18-Sep by JPeelen
Latest 18-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 17-Sep by graylion
Latest 17-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 16-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 14-Sep by smg762
Latest 8-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 7-Sep by EmericD
Latest 5-Sep by stancrist
Latest 4-Sep by renatohm
Latest 4-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 2-Sep by stancrist
Latest 25-Aug by stancrist
4-May
gatnerd said:The HK 416's march across Europe looks unstoppable.
Well using Luxembourg military as an argument for that seems far fetched... since they have a strength of less than 1000 personel.
The march of HK is not unstoppable because of the 416 but because they are basically the only one left. The 416 is just the product they are currently selling. If HK would be selling a bullpub version of the G36 currently this would be marching across Europe.
HK BTW is now trying to introduce the HK 433 into the marked as a 416 replacement. The 433 is specifically designed to replace the 416 and has some improvements and solutions that adress common critizism of the 416.
4-May
JPeelen said:From a German point of view, it is the AR15 march that is unstoppable.
Not really. The HK416 really is a AR18 that pretends to be an AR15.
Its also pure chance. The 433 was not picked by the German army in favor of the 416 due to some technicallities and the main argument that "we know the 416" since it has been in use by our SF. Who will most likely transition to the 433 once they used up their current stock of 416 based rifles. After all the 433 has been designed to their specs and to adress their wishes for improvement.
It again just a case of the bureaucracy screwing up.
4-May
gatnerd said:I wouldn't be surprised if we see Britain replace their L85 with the HK 416 at some point.
Currently the L85 get an upgrade by HK. So it will be in service for some more years. When the L85 replacement will become a thing in 5 or so years HK will be selling the next generation of their products. So the chance that the UK will transition to the 416 are rather slim unless they hurry.
4-May
The thing of most interest from the video posted in the NGSW thread was that the XM7 bare gun is 2 oz lighter than the MR556 with 16"bbl - the configuration that matches the M27. This was quite unexpected. The takeaway probably should be that the M27 is excessively heavy, but still the XM7 is not as much of an increase in weight as I and probably others expected.
4-May
schnuersi said:Not really. The HK416 really is a AR18 that pretends to be an AR15.
I figure HK got experience on AR18 style systems while working on the L85 and decided to use it as their basis for future weapons.
So the 416 is the revenge of the AR18 and the L85 on the AR15.
4-May
DavidPawley said:2 oz lighter than the MR556 with 16"bbl
The MR556 is insanely heavy at 8.6lb. I think it's probably the heaviest 16" 5.56 rifle in the world by a major manufacturer.
https://hk-usa.com/hk-models/mr556a1/
It's about 0.7-0.8lbs heavier than the M27/416 16", which is itself closer in weight to the 7.62 SCAR than M4.
FM-15 2: 6lbs
LE6920: 6.29LBS
M4A1 FN: 6.36LBS
S+T BR18 14.5”: 6.39bs
M4A2 416 barrel: 6.5lbs
KAK SR15 Mod 2: 6.55lbs
LWRC IC DI: 6.6lbs
KelTec RDB: 6.7lbs
ARX 100: 6.8LBS
T91 16”: 6.99lbs
ST BR18 20”: 7.05lbs
Thales F90: 7.17lbs
SCAR 16S: 7.25lbs
LWRC IC-A5: 7.3lbs
ACR: 7.3lbs
Arsenal SLR-106: 7.3lbs
CZ Bren 2 MS: 7.3lbs
4-May
DavidPawley said:The thing of most interest from the video posted in the NGSW thread was that the XM7 bare gun is 2 oz lighter than the MR556 with 16"bbl... This was quite unexpected. The takeaway probably should be that...the XM7 is not as much of an increase in weight as I and probably others expected.
Erroneous comparison = Erroneous conclusion.
FYI, the US Army does not use the MR556 rifle.
4-May
Jeff (Jefffar) said:I figure HK got experience on AR18 style systems while working on the L85 and decided to use it as their basis for future weapons.
Nope they used their experience on AR18 type short stroke gas systems gaine during the developement of the G36 wich is basically an AR18 in plastic clothing and with G3/MP3 ergonomics.
Jeff (Jefffar) said:So the 416 is the revenge of the AR18 and the L85 on the AR15.
The 416 is just what the US marked, only marked where reasonable profits could be made from the mid '90 to '10, wanted. They then started to sell it everywhere. The thing is allmost all governmental agencies buy COTS these days. The 416 is the very definition of COTS. Its also tested by most major players and agencies, qualified and combat prooven. It basically sells itself. So HK did the sensible thing and dropped allmost all other products except for those that are actively selling and/or in a running procurement program.
4-May
gatnerd said:The MR556 is insanely heavy at 8.6lb. I think it's probably the heaviest 16" 5.56 rifle in the world by a major manufacturer.
Since this is a civillian configuration it hardly matters for military procurement programs.
BTW HK deliberately increased the weight of some 416 and especially 417 versions because of (governmental agency) customer request. There are steel uppers available for example. These besides offering improved wear and tear resistance have better harmoics for improved accuracy and lower feld recoil by increasing weapon weight.
Sometimes heavier is better.