gatnerd

Military Guns and Ammunition

Hosted by gatnerd

This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.

  • 3338
    MEMBERS
  • 189787
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Ukraine weapons thread   General Military Discussion

Started 24-Feb by gatnerd; 139398 views.
Jeff (Jefffar)

From: Jeff (Jefffar)

26-Jun

Don't forget, a 105mm howitzer is better than no howitzer. 

ESOB (RStinson5)

From: ESOB (RStinson5)

26-Jun

I am aware that U S weapons have been sent....I  am also aware that "more is needed " ....I will post want I wanted to clarify, in the 60' surplus offers Colt 45's for $ 20 bucks....I did not luck out on this offer. I understand that early Colt's had sleeved ballels...the bearing fix was a lmprovent.  I have not forgotten one of my biggest faux pas.  At 80 plus I have many more  memories  that I cannot recall. I am a South pas and I remember that day as a teen how that checked grip felt and the kick of that "Colt".

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

26-Jun

Propaganda shells , i imagine these fuses are set to eject the leaflet payload at a predetermined point.

Russian BTG positioning according to Ukrainian MOD

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

27-Jun

GTA Ukraine , atempted snatching a BMP under fire

Meanwhile in Russia, they seem to be sending train loads of old BTS-4 recovery vehicles to the the front , like Soviet Military before it Russians never fielded numbers of armored recovery vehicles to match the size of its armored forces . Hence all the stuck and abandoned vehicles . BTS-4 is also quite limited in power vs never Brem recovery vehicles as its based on a T55 tank 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiNsr2t92NUh

Gr1ff1th

From: Gr1ff1th

28-Jun

PzH2000 have arrived in ukraine, along with a friendly greeting to the russians



 

  • Edited 28 June 2022 1:20  by  Gr1ff1th
17thfabn

From: 17thfabn

30-Jun

If they are sending Leapord 1 with the 105 mm there are probably 1,000s of US M60  tanks that would be a rough equivalent that could be sent.

graylion

From: graylion

30-Jun

yup. I do have my doubts about this though. I think they dug up old information and drew the wrong conclusions. Also, Those tanks would be useful as FSVs, but not as MBTs. 

schnuersi

From: schnuersi

30-Jun

graylion said:

Leo1A5 headed to UA?

there are no substancial news on this topic.

Mustrakrakis

From: Mustrakrakis

1-Jul

I'm disappointed.  We used to have a number of posters on this forum that were very vocal about the supremacy of Russian equipment, and were ready and willing to insert such opinions into nearly any conversation.  (In truth, it was mostly Soviet equipment or derivatives that were being discussed, but whatevs.  Those largely sucked too.)  Are we not talking about this anymore?  In truth, I only came back here to see the "muh monkey model" rationalizations and mine a little salt, but we seem to be talking around that subject entirely without addressing the rather obvious elephant in the room.  Again, very disappointing, but I suppose when this is all over and enough years have elapsed for those with short attention spans to forget the recent past, they'll start talking about it again, and we'll get to hear yet again about how good the ACTSHUAL T-72 truly is.  I miss those days, and I look forward to the return of those delusional muppets.  They could be annoying, but they were entertaining nonetheless. 

TOP