Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 15:58 by stancrist
Latest 26-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 13:42 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 6:29 by graylion
Latest 4:32 by mpopenker
Latest 21-Mar by ZailC
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 21-Mar by stancrist
Latest 20-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 19-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 18-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15-Mar by JPeelen
Latest 13-Mar by taschoene
Latest 13-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 13-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 13-Mar by Jeff (Jefffar)
Latest 13-Mar by Refleks
Latest 12-Mar by graylion
Latest 11-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 9-Mar by graylion
Latest 7-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 6-Mar by stancrist
Latest 6-Mar by graylion
Latest 6-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 5-Mar by gatnerd
Latest 5-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 1-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 26-Feb by graylion
26-Jan
i was wondering about a cartridge which is about the size of a 44 magnum or so, but uses an extremely wide sabot. Lets say, 10mm or 11mm. The sabot would be a 'puller' design - it only grips the nose of the bullet. This means it can be very small so you get more powder space.
In theory it should be able to achiieve huge muzzle energies, with not much powder required. any thoughts on this idea?
would an 11mm sabot let you reach the energies of say, a 6.5 creedmore or 762x51?
26-Jan
I've thought about these, and I don't think they're possible (yet). The problems you need to overcome are to do with making sure the sabot and the bullet are inseperable until the sabot can fall away. In a tank gun, long rod penetrators are frequently ribbed, giving the sabot lots of surface to hold on to. I can go into lengths about how i think this wont work in small arms, but let me put it like this: it's easier hammering a nail the tried and tested way than it is holding it by the shaft with pliers and hammering on the pliers to drive it in.
But say you're a wizard, and you busy yourself with creating exotic combustion weapons otherwise limited by physics, instead of wizardly things such as building your skeleton army. A .44 magnum has a case capacity comparable to a 6.8 SPC (3-5% more), so that minus the volume your bullet-sabot chimera takes up is your available space for powder. Depending on bullet+sabot mass, pressure, and barrel length, you'd end up at 2000, maybe 3000 joules for the bullet+sabot. Then the sabot goes away, so you'd end up with less energy still.
As a halfway solution i've thought about fitting bullets with a breakaway belt. You'd save some sabot mass and volume since you do away with the entire base. But, you still need to hold onto the bullet in a way that's inseparable inside the bore, and loses the sabot consistently once outside.
26-Jan
I’ve thought about having the sabot clip into a ridge in the projector, such as the juncture where the EPR steel tip meets the jacket.
An extreme option would be the grooves used by Elite for their T6 projectiles for the 5.7.