Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 6:14 by gatnerd
Latest 4:04 by autogun
Latest 2:20 by gatnerd
Latest 9-Feb by Farmplinker
Latest 0:45 by gatnerd
Latest 0:10 by gatnerd
Latest 29-Mar by stancrist
Latest 29-Mar by autogun
Latest 28-Mar by stancrist
Latest 28-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 27-Mar by smg762
Latest 26-Mar by EmericD
Latest 26-Mar by stancrist
Latest 25-Mar by nincomp
Latest 23-Mar by graylion
Latest 23-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 21-Mar by ZailC
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 18-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15-Mar by JPeelen
Latest 13-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 13-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 13-Mar by Jeff (Jefffar)
Latest 13-Mar by Refleks
Latest 12-Mar by graylion
Latest 11-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 9-Mar by graylion
Latest 7-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 6-Mar by graylion
Latest 6-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 5-Mar by gatnerd
Latest 5-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
5-Feb
Where would one integrate NLOS missiles like Spike or Brimstone? Brigade I assume? Together with a battery of MLRS and one of 155?
5-Feb
Depends on the opposition and your doctrine. I could see NLOS at company level if you want to engage at longer range in order to increase the amount of time you have the enemy under fire. Say an expeditionary force that's dealing with a heavily mechanized enemy and the EF is firepower heavy.
6-Feb
Farmplinker said:Depends on the opposition and your doctrine. I could see NLOS at company level if you want to engage at longer range in order to increase the amount of time you have the enemy under fire. Say an expeditionary force that's dealing with a heavily mechanized enemy and the EF is firepower heavy.
I am thinking Elbonia again. Company has AMOS. Batallion would have what? The basket is
The one thing that occurs to me is that there seems to be a lot of overlap in capability between MLRS and Spear? But Brimstone/Spear has a smaller warhead and being a cruise missile might be harder to intercept?
6-Feb
Another advantage for Brimstone is more launch platforms. Strap a launcher on the back of a pickup, you have mobile artillery, cheapish. MLRS has fewer options.
6-Feb
Also, with the EW version you can do some fun stuff. Launch a swarm of those at eg Kerch Bridge and follow up with ATACMS, since without that S400 would probably destroy those ATACMS
6-Feb
I would add this condition: "what is the velocity preferred for a NLOS effector used at which organical level?"
Tammuz-NLOS: 190 m/s. Cost per unit: go figure, around 220k
WB warmate 2 loiter fixed-wing UAS: 22 m/s. Cost per unit, 22k (as published on a Polish contract)
6-Feb
WBelectronics is the Polish company which has produced it. It has some limits that need to be overcomed
6-Feb
graylion said:Where would one integrate NLOS missiles like Spike or Brimstone? Brigade I assume? Together with a battery of MLRS and one of 155?
The range of Brimstone and SpikeNLOS firmly puts them in to the brigade level asset category.
In the case of Spike NLOS because of its two way data exchange becomes something in between precision artillery and long range indirect AT. Brimstone seems more limited.
I do not think MLRS is a brigade asset. Nor should it be one. It seens best placed at division or higher.