gatnerd

Military Guns and Ammunition

Hosted by gatnerd

This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.

  • 3420
    MEMBERS
  • 197151
    MESSAGES
  • 26
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Ultimax 100 replaced with Colt IAR   Small Arms <20mm

Started 8-May by gatnerd; 2300 views.
gatnerd

From: gatnerd

8-May

In the latest sign of the AR15's relentless conquering of the globe, Singapore has fallen.

Possibly the world greatest Automatic Rifle / LMG hybrid is to be replaced with...this.

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2023/05/08/singapore-replace-ultimax-colt-iar/

More video of Colt IAR:

Shooting Colt IAR vs LMG Showdown Full Auto Rifles

Iconic US firearms manufacturer Colt set out to develop a light machine gun that the US Armed Forces could utilize in replacing heavier belt-fed weapons such...

And more historical background:

And a look at what was lost:

Ultimax 2000 Singapore LMG Full Auto Mag Dumps

Got to shoot a rare gun in the US. An Ultimax 2000. It takes standard AR magazines so I loaded up my Magpul D60.

stancrist

From: stancrist

8-May

gatnerd said:

Possibly the world greatest Automatic Rifle / LMG hybrid is to be replaced with...[the Colt IAR].

Which suggests that perhaps the Ultimax is not as great as some think...

gatnerd

From: gatnerd

8-May

Certainly possible.

I suspect though we will be seeing Singapore switch to an AR15 type rifle,  and that’s the reason for the switch. Being a conscript force they may wish to simplify training with both rifle and SAW to have near identical manual of arms and magazines.

Hoping I’m wrong and that they stay with the bullpup master race. 

farmplinker2

From: farmplinker2

8-May

Or maybe STANAG mag equipped SAR21?

schnuersi

From: schnuersi

9-May

gatnerd said:

Certainly possible.

I suspect though we will be seeing Singapore switch to an AR15 type rifle, and that’s the reason for the switch. Being a conscript force they may wish to simplify training with both rifle and SAW to have near identical manual of arms and magazines.

My educated guess is: Its all about economic factors.
Without significant foreign sales its hardly sustainable for a small nation like Singapore to have a national small arms program.
They most likely phased the Ultimax and parts for it out of production a while ago and now spares are so expensive that the military decided to transition to a new, cheap and easy sustainable platform.

Chances are the SAR21 will go in the near future as well.

In reply toRe: msg 5
Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

9-May

The massive aluminum heatsink on Colt IAR is and interesting feature

njb3737

From: njb3737

9-May

I think that’s about right , the SAR21 replacement- BR18 seems to have died some years back so I’m guessing ST Engineering are getting out of the small arms market.

Both rifles are no longer featured on the web site and with no substantial sales I think it’s all over.

however they may make something under license as they did with the M16 which was Singapore’s first service rifle prior to SAR21.

stancrist

From: stancrist

9-May

njb3737 said:

however they may make something under license as they did with the M16 which was Singapore’s first service rifle prior to SAR21.

How is it any less expensive to tool up for and manufacture a licensed foreign weapon, than to produce a domestic design (like the BR18)?

JPeelen

From: JPeelen

9-May

A STANAG for a 5.56 mm magazine was proposed but never signed. The often mentioned STANAG magazine does not exist. Tiny  details of the magazine are the cornerstone of reliable functioning in a given weapon type. 

Just look at STANAG compliant 5.56 mm cartridges, which turn out to not function reliably in every rifle design. The same would in my view happen with a STANAG magazine.    

schnuersi

From: schnuersi

9-May

stancrist said:

How is it any less expensive to tool up for and manufacture a licensed foreign weapon, than to produce a domestic design (like the BR18)?

No R&D cost. No qulifications. Little testing.
You pay and get the all around happy package. If there are problems you have a supplier taking care of it or at least to talk to. Its even possible to have parts that are more complicated and expensive to manufacture delivered and just assamble them.

Its really much cheaper in most cases.

TOP