Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 19:09 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 17:04 by JPeelen
Latest 17-Aug by SiverSurfeR
Latest 12-Aug by SiverSurfeR
Latest 12-Aug by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 10-Aug by autogun
Latest 3-Aug by nincomp
Latest 3-Aug by dudutin
Latest 1-Aug by stancrist
Latest 31-Jul by gatnerd
Latest 27-Jul by Guardsman26
Latest 26-Jul by Refleks
5/9/19
poliorcetes said...
I meant that it is similar to SiG recent range of assault rifle products, with a different back receiver than AR-15 and with the possibility of mounting a folding stock
Okay, you've got me very confused. Your responses seem completely unrelated to your original comment.
You: "SiG's carbine entry looks like a short barrel marksman rifle more than an assault rifle."
Me: "To me, it looks pretty much like a beefier version of the improved M4 carbine used by SOCOM."
You: "Look at the back of the receiver"
Me: "I don't see anything unique about the back of the receiver, and the whole rifle still looks to me like a M4 URGI on steroids."
You: "As any other recent SiG design, the back of the receiver protudes far from the grip."
Me: "How does the shape of the back of the receiver make it look like a DMR?"
5/9/19
You are right. I didn't develop it enough. Sorry, Stan, I mixed the two issues.
5/9/19
poliorcetes said...
Anyways, how SiG carbine is supposed to tame .270 WSL-like recoil?
With a suppressor and in-line stock?
5/9/19
haha yes. With that. The operator will be able to do rapid fire... if dispersion cone is not important :)
5/9/19
poliorcetes said...
Anyways, how SiG carbine is supposed to tame .270 WSL-like recoil?
It isn't. Riflemen are supposed to take steroids and lift weights so they get big and strong enough to handle the .270 WSL-like recoil. ;^)
5/9/19
gatnerd said...
But, it appears to have a vertical "feed tower" in order for it to be inserted into a mag well on the LMG. If that's the case, I suspect the ammo boxes are going to be unnecessary bulky in pouches, due to the need to accommodate the ~2" vertical feed tower. Similar to the problem with storing AR compatible drum mags.
Perhaps the black T bar thing is a detachable part of the gun, but the belt boxes themselves attach to it in some way that is not apparent?
6/9/19
"Perhaps the black T bar thing is a detachable part of the gun, but the belt boxes themselves attach to it in some way that is not apparent?" That's also a possibility, although I'm not sure how the box would reliably clip into such a small area if its not being inserted into the magwell. |