Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 6:43 by poliorcetes
Latest 2:05 by stancrist
Latest 5-Feb by graylion
Latest 5-Feb by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 5-Feb by Farmplinker
Latest 4-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 4-Feb by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 4-Feb by poliorcetes
Latest 3-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 2-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 1-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 1-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 31-Jan by DavidPawley
Latest 30-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 30-Jan by Guardsman26
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 27-Jan by stancrist
Latest 27-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 26-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 26-Jan by autogun
Latest 25-Jan by schnuersi
Latest 24-Jan by ZailC
Latest 24-Jan by stancrist
Latest 24-Jan by renatohm
Latest 23-Jan by Apsyda
Latest 21-Jan by graylion
Latest 21-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 20-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 18-Jan by nincomp
Latest 17-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 14-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 14-Jan by Refleks
Latest 13-Jan by EmericD
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 11-Jan by RovingPedant
Latest 8-Jan by wiggy556
Latest 7-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by roguetechie
15/9/20
That's a replaceable cam stop yes. I don't know if the Haenel has it but those guns were designed by the same people
15/9/20
I think Haenel MK556 is indeed has that replacable cam recess thingy, judging by this image. You can see a bolted metal piece on the left side of the upper, though it appears to be smaller than the one on the MCX,.
15/9/20
I think it should be made clear that the "Haenel" of today has absolutely nothing in common with the old "C.G. Haenel" company beyond buying the rights, from whom ever, to use the name.
15/9/20
gatnerd said:So the Bundeswehr is essentially getting a lower cost HK416.
Perhaps just as importantly, they're getting a HK416 that doesn't have a H&K logo on the receiver. I think that there were some politics involved in this selection.
16/9/20
What is the funcion of the lever that I marked on the photo? I believe that is some kind of foregrip retainer, but I would like to be sure
16/9/20
Yes its a clamp for a toolless handguard fixation. But i am not quite certain if its not mostly to avoid the HK patent on that. I think it must be quite a dance around all the patents that same folks have signed for 416 ,MPX, Car816,MP 556 etc
The patent density on Ar15 derivatives is getting ridiculous.
But from what we know now the MK556 was supposedly tested slightly better in tests than HK but more importantly was 52mio Eur cheaper, although that 52mio saving is also down due to some creative accounting on how much longer rifles could last because of the replaceable cam thingy.
Heckler patents and Haenel
16/9/20
Great info, thank you.
Is there any indication of the barrel steel / barrel life for the MK556 vs the H&K416?
Barrels being the major part that wears out first, it would seem that would have been a consideration for overall service life cost. And the 416 is known to have a very long barrel life.