This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 16:07 by Farmplinker
Latest 16:05 by Farmplinker
Latest 15:21 by smg762
Latest 24-May by renatohm
Latest 15:19 by smg762
Latest 15:04 by smg762
Latest 21-Oct by Refleks
Latest 21-Oct by poliorcetes
Latest 21-Oct by smg762
Latest 19-Oct by roguetechie
Latest 19-Oct by poliorcetes
Latest 17-Oct by gatnerd
Latest 14-Oct by smg762
Latest 14-Oct by Mustrakrakis
Latest 13-Oct by DavidPawley
Latest 12-Oct by graylion
Latest 11-Oct by Farmplinker
Latest 10-Oct by poliorcetes
Latest 4-Oct by poliorcetes
Latest 2-Oct by stancrist
Latest 1-Oct by EwingGreg
Latest 1-Oct by EwingGreg
Latest 29-Sep by Galland5
Latest 29-Sep by hunterwolf21
Latest 29-Sep by hobbes154
Latest 27-Sep by smg762
Latest 24-Sep by gatnerd
Looking that old 6.5 CT cutaway, I had a simple and possibly stupid idea: since bullet tip is totally surrounded by plastic case... why don't make it as pointy as possible, in order to improve slightly aerodinamics and armor penetration?
It's not a stupid idea. The 6.8mm projectile developed for NGSW is about as pointy as possible.
I meant pointy as a needle, not only a nice BC. Like, reducing impact surface as much as possible, less than 1 mm^2
You mean like an APFSDS? I guess that it has been debated here that such formats aren't really useful below some 25 mm, and APDS not good below 12.7.
For rifles and LMG, the 6.5 pictured above is basically as good as it gets.
No, I mean the same specifications as XM1186 but with a pointier point, so to speak. With the least possible point surface
You quickly run into issues with both length to diameter ratio and aerodynamic issues.
Bullets are like aircraft In that their exact shaping determines how much drag they will experience across the various velocity regimes.
What's ideal at 3300 feet per second isn't the same as what's ideal at 1500 feet per second, so you wind up making compromises to get acceptable and stable flight characteristics across the entire range of velocities your projectile could be traveling at when it impacts the target.
As you've pointed out though, you also have to consider it's impact characteristics too.
This puts you in a position where you need to have acceptable terminal performance and flight characteristics throughout a pretty large velocity window.
Because of this, no matter what you're doing it will be a compromise.
In the case of making the bullet tip needle fine, this can create drag and or stability issues that you don't want.
This is why bullet tips are shapes as they are. Unfortunately I can't remember the name of the term specifically for the bullet tip shape and fineness ratio at this time though.
I'm sure someone else will come in and expand on what I've said though.
This is my current bullet shape. full spitzer, no meplat.
And yes, I agree that CTA would make it possible to have the spitzer actually be 'spitz' (pointy in German).
Hardened Steel penetrator with polymer rest of bullet. My current v0 is 4100 fps, Which I am sure could even be improved upon with CTA and higher pressures. Mind you, I am at ca 560 MPa.
I would like to understand that aerodinamic issues: a really pointy bullet would not be so much different compared with a pitot tube on a mach 2 fighter...
The Pitot tube isn't expected to keep its shape upon impact...
I seem to recall that pointy projectiles tend to break apart even at very shallow impact angles, which means that their usefulness may actually backfire if the impact angle isn't perfectly aligned.