gatnerd

Military Guns and Ammunition

Hosted by gatnerd

This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.

  • 3395
    MEMBERS
  • 194942
    MESSAGES
  • 1
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Ukraine weapons thread   General Military Discussion

Started 24/2/22 by gatnerd; 278810 views.
gatnerd

From: gatnerd

29-Jan

Farmplinker said:

Honestly, the US needs a new energetics plant or two

That would be great, as well as arguably even more important, a factory that produces the precursor chemicals for energetics. (and medicine precursors would also be wise...)

gatnerd

From: gatnerd

29-Jan

schnuersi said:

A single Rh202 has about the ROF of the two 30 mm of the BMPT. Usually all rounds are with tracers. If they fire bursts its quite a spectacle

Very impressive, that little guy was hauling ass in terms of ROF. 

....

"Government is in dept at the Defense Industry. Who funny enough last week started to threaten legal action.
Its a complete and utter cluster fuck."

Ah, thats a bummer. I had hoped the lack of news on my end was just the english papers/blogs missing some German activity...

Is your read on this that this is typical government incompetence (of which I'm quite familiar with here, as I'm sure we all are) or is the vibe that this is something more deliberate? 

I know the previous Defense lady got the boot. Any sign the new Defense head will be better?

gatnerd

From: gatnerd

29-Jan

Mr. T (MrT4) said:

German submarines next

That would be completely bananas. But also pretty silly given the time it would take to train a sub crew (among numerous other issues...)

However in some implausible parallel universe where this did happen and it worked, it would be a hell of an ad for German sub exports. 

That said, I'd much rather the US bought a bunch of sneaky German U-boats for Taiwan... 

schnuersi

From: schnuersi

29-Jan

gatnerd said:

Is your read on this that this is typical government incompetence (of which I'm quite familiar with here, as I'm sure we all are) or is the vibe that this is something more deliberate?

As far as I can tell its both. There are several things coming together.
Of course there is a deep reluctance of the current administration to give funds to the military. So in their eyes every day that passes without the military getting even a cent is a good day. So they don't really go out of their way to speed things up.
Which is pretty hard to begin with. The entire organisation of the DoD and the armed forces has been so starved of resources the last 30+ years they don't even know to handle such sums anymore. The organisational knowledge is gone. Furthermore the regulations have been changed so every penny is bitten trough first. Twice if possible. This means lots and lots of bureaucracy and paperwork to get funds released. The regulations and procedures have not been changed. So they handle a 100 billion budget in the same way as the meager millions they go befor.
So far no streamlining of processes or adjustment of regulations has even been talked about.
Then there is the problem of inflation and rising cost. This is pretty new for Germany. So again no procedures and regulations. The original plan for the 100 billion had to be canned allready because the prices have changed. This results in a technically wrong plan which means it is rejected. A new plan has to be made. Which means back to square one. Get new offers and prices. Evaluate. Formulate a new spending plan. Get it approved by the parilament... which in such a dynamic situations means prices have changed yet again... its a vicious circle. This results in the spending plan being in bureaucratic limbo. Until regulations are adjusted it is unlikely that it will get out any time soon.
In the mean time the world is not standing still. The industry doesn't wait. They simply move on.

gatnerd said:

I know the previous Defense lady got the boot. Any sign the new Defense head will be better?

Besides the "finally a male secretary of defense" I don't see how things should get significalntly better. After all he is a career politician from the same party as the lady befor. He also has never served or worked in the real economy.
He is allready trying to raise the morale though. He visited the troops in his first week. Even wore a standard issue camo jacket, which his predecessor refursed to to, and adressed all soldiers by their correct rank, something his predecessor also refused to do. He also is from the security and defense sector of his party. So maybe some things will change but so far it allways has been improve things, make it faster, leaner, cheaper but do not change anything. Which did not work. Unless this approach is thrown overboard there will be no real improvement.

graylion

From: graylion

29-Jan

U212NFS would be brilliant for the Black Sea

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

29-Jan

Diesel subs can't really stay at sea that long so how would this sub arm, fuel, and generally not get wrecked first time it at the base, I don't see any armored submarine pens in Ukraine.

In any case while we are at slicing a dicing Germany like kebab, Kriegsmarine has 6 subs but like most of the German military its all in a state of disrepair so only one sub is kinda in active duty rest is in docks undergoing repairs

graylion

From: graylion

29-Jan

Mr. T (MrT4) said:

I don't see any armored submarine pens in Ukraine.

Those can be built. I am talking post war.

  • Edited 29 January 2023 16:34  by  graylion
Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

1-Feb

Drone 'recovery'

Drone on drone action

Drone tethered to a fishing line to prevent a hijacking by EW

Mr. T (MrT4)

From: Mr. T (MrT4)

1-Feb

Some less than spec Ukrainan body armor , welded up from 3 sprint steel plates and laminated over

gatnerd

From: gatnerd

3-Feb

Spectacular interactive article with text, images, and gifs of artillery shell manufacturing in the US, step by step.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/02/02/us/dc-ammunition.html

TOP