Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 16:08 by graylion
Latest 24-Apr by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 16:04 by graylion
Latest 8:21 by schnuersi
Latest 1-Jul by DavidPawley
Latest 27-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 22-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 19-Jun by stancrist
Latest 18-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 17-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 17-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 15-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 12-Jun by 17thfabn
Latest 11-Jun by autogun
Latest 10-Jun by stancrist
Latest 8-Jun by autogun
24-Apr
As mentioned above, when materials less dense than lead are used, the mass of a bullet particular shaped bullet goes down. The ballistic coefficient is sectional density divided by form factor. The only way reduce the drag of a less dense bullet is to improve its form factor. This leads to attempts at highly optimized bullet profiles.
That is more difficult than it appears because as a bullet travels, it is not pointed directly into the oncoming air. Even a fully stabilized bullet travels at a slight angle to the oncoming air. Before it "goes to sleep" or becomes fully stabilized, things are worse. The bullets angle of attack to the oncoming airstream can vary widely as it goes through various oscillations. The drag for many bullet profiles is increased significantly at the larger angles-of-attack that occur during these oscillations. If I recall correctly, Emeric once stated that he has seen doppler radar numbers that indicate some bullets are still oscillating at 600m. In other words, the drag measured from the flight paths of real bullets can be much higher than expected.
24-Apr
When talking beter form factors in practice much of it is in the bullet tip. Note how many solids have extremely sharp tips.