Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 3:58 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 31-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 31-Jan by graylion
Latest 31-Jan by Piper106a
Latest 26/7/22 by Refleks
Latest 31-Jan by DavidPawley
Latest 30-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 30-Jan by Guardsman26
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 29-Jan by graylion
Latest 27-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 27-Jan by stancrist
Latest 27-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 26-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 26-Jan by graylion
Latest 26-Jan by autogun
Latest 25-Jan by schnuersi
Latest 24-Jan by ZailC
Latest 24-Jan by stancrist
Latest 24-Jan by renatohm
Latest 23-Jan by Apsyda
Latest 21-Jan by graylion
Latest 21-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 20-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 18-Jan by nincomp
Latest 17-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 15-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 14-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 14-Jan by Refleks
Latest 13-Jan by EmericD
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 11-Jan by RovingPedant
Latest 8-Jan by wiggy556
Latest 7-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by autogun
Latest 3-Jan by stancrist
Latest 3-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
22/6/22
schnuersi said:stancrist said: Every rifleman a grenadier.
I am not convinced that this works.
That's understandable. I am not certain that it would work. It would depend upon whether or not a viable weapon system can be developed.
At this point it's only a theory, a concept, based in large part on video evidence. Like this, for example: https://youtu.be/4UolMYY7QaA?t=174
schnuersi said:Who does the main job of the rifleman then? Carrying ammo, providing additional eyes and ears, replacement personell and short range fighting?
Ammo bearer may be the main job of the German rifleman, but employing his assigned weapon in infantry combat is the main job of the American rifleman.
22/6/22
stancrist said:That's understandable. I am not certain that it would work. It would depend upon whether or not a viable weapon system can be developed. At this point it's only a theory, a concept, based in large part on video evidence. Like this, for example: https://youtu.be/4UolMYY7QaA?t=174
Hum...
First, let's have a look of a 120 mm canister shot:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Riy4EaoR76U
22/6/22
??? I don't get the connection. Are you saying it's impossible to make a 30mm (or larger caliber) grenade launcher?
22/6/22
stancrist said:I don't get the connection. Are you saying it's impossible to make a 30mm (or larger caliber) grenade launcher?
He is saying that a 30 mm GL will not be comparable to a 30 mm AC.
For starters the shell of a 30x173 carries a lot of KE. This makes shrapnel type ammo very effective. A 30 mm GL will not have this and thus can not use this kind of ammo effectively. It will have to be a HE-Frag. Which works different and has a different effect.
A 30 mm HEI shell weights >350 g. That is roughly one third more compared to a 40 mm grenade. You can do the math easily to figure out the possible MV with a still barable recoil.
22/6/22
stancrist said:??? I don't get the connection. Are you saying it's impossible to make a 30mm (or larger caliber) grenade launcher?
No, I'm saying that you can't make a man-portable grenade launcher with the destructive power of a 30 x 173 mm AC, just like a 12 gauge shotgun will not deliver the destructive power of a 120 mm canister shot, even if the concept is "the same".
22/6/22
EmericD said:I'm saying that you can't make a man-portable grenade launcher with the destructive power of a 30 x 173 mm AC...
Okay. The only trouble is, I never said a grenade launcher would have the same destructive power as a 30mm cannon.
What I said is the video is an example of airburst fragmentation which makes me think the concept could possibly work.
The 30mm cannon airburst videos show fragmentation effect much better than, for example, 40mm grenade airbursts.
23/6/22
300 metres and you are struggling - even with IR - except that it is high power - e.g. vehicle powered.
23/6/22
stancrist said:You have a very similar "failure point" with rifle grenades. You can't load the grenade onto the rifle, take precise aim, and launch the grenade, in just 2 seconds. You need to expose yourself and stay perfectly motionless for much more than that.
Missed your edit.
Are you really (and seriously) saying that you can't point & shoot a rifle in less than 2 seconds, because you can find a random video on Youtube with someone who is not pointing & shooting a rifle in less than 2 seconds?
When doing patrol, the point man already loaded the grenade on the rifle, he just need to point the rifle, shoot, and the grenade is airborne.
23/6/22
stancrist said:What I said is the video is an example of airburst fragmentation which makes me think the concept could possibly work.
The concept of firing bursts of high power 30 mm AC canon at targets is working, we already know that. It can even defeat tanks.
Thinking that an individual weapon could do something remotely similar is, well, wishful thinking.
stancrist said:The 30mm cannon airburst videos show fragmentation effect much better than, for example, 40mm grenade airbursts.
Do you mean that the 40 x 53 mm is not effective enough and that we need a more powerful grenade?
If so, what is the rationale behind advocating for an individual, man-portable, grenade launcher, that will definitively be less powerful than a 40 x 53 mm?
Or maybe you are thinking about using a fully dressed Mk47 (with tripod and FCS) as the squad main asset, while the rest of the squad is issued a MP7, a spare mag and as many grenades they could carry?
That would probably work, but wouldn't be a very american way to fight!
23/6/22
EmericD said:That would probably work, but wouldn't be a very american way to fight!
No? Lobbing HE at everything in sight strikes me as very American ;)
Something that surprises me a little is that nobody has proposed a 30x113 gas loaded, mechanically fired dismount gun with a tripod ;)